Wednesday, August 31, 2011

Clarence Thomas and ObamaCare

Michael Barone, Washington Examiner
In the glossy pages of The New Yorker, in graceful prose and with good reporting, the dreams and nightmares of the admirers of Barack Obama and his policies lie exposed.The dreams include Ryan Lizza's report last April in which he quoted an Obama adviser as saying the president's policy on Libya was "leading from behind." This week, as Tripoli seemed about to fall, the magazine's editor, David Remnick, hailed Obama's "calculated modesty."The nightmare appears in last week's issue, in Jeffrey Toobin's lengthy article on Supreme Court...

Source: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2011/08/31/clarence_thomas_and_obamacare_262660.html

John Howard Mike Huckabee Saddam Hussein Hu Jintao Kim Jong Il

Voyage to the Bottom of See-Ya'-Later

Today Joe Strupp and Ben Dimiero at Media Matters observed something I commented upon a short while ago: RightNetwork, the Huffington Post wannabe with Kelsey Grammer as its spokesmodel, is dead in the water, a ghost ship adrift in the soupy mists.

RightNetwork, the conservative media outlet that launched less than a year ago with great fanfare -- and investors that included actor Kelsey Grammer -- appears to have stalled for more than a month.

Rightnetwork.com, which features video and other content has not been updated since late June, and the network's Twitter feed and Facebook pages have been stagnant since May 31.

RightNetwork President Kevin McFeeley claims it is "business as usual," an answer he gave several times when asked specifically about a lack of new programming and web items, as well as about the status of the network's future funding.

But from the looks of the site, launched Sept. 8, 2010, things appear to be at a standstill.

The most recent videos on RightNetwork's website appear to be several Father's Day messages from soldiers posted on June 17.

It was RightNetwork, recall, that thought it was a marv-y idea to give the past-expiration-date novelty act Joe the Plumber his own dumb-ass talk-show.

Not mentioned in the Media Matters piece, not that it?s of any major significance, is that two of RightNetwork?s contributors?Dan Collins and Joy McCann?jumped overboard and, sadder but no wiser, started up their own conservative group blog and news site, The Conservatory, which does update frequently, providing fresh stale content for unchoosy readers.

Today Joe Strupp and Ben Dimiero at Media Matters observed something I commented upon a short while ago: RightNetwork, the Huffington Post wannabe with Kelsey Grammer as its spokesmodel, is dead in the water, a ghost ship adrift in the soupy mists.

RightNetwork, the conservative media outlet that launched less than a year ago with great fanfare -- and investors that included actor Kelsey Grammer -- appears to have stalled for more than a month.

Rightnetwork.com, which features video and other content has not been updated since late June, and the network's Twitter feed and Facebook pages have been stagnant since May 31.

RightNetwork President Kevin McFeeley claims it is "business as usual," an answer he gave several times when asked specifically about a lack of new programming and web items, as well as about the status of the network's future funding.

But from the looks of the site, launched Sept. 8, 2010, things appear to be at a standstill.

The most recent videos on RightNetwork's website appear to be several Father's Day messages from soldiers posted on June 17.

It was RightNetwork, recall, that thought it was a marv-y idea to give the past-expiration-date novelty act Joe the Plumber his own dumb-ass talk-show.

Not mentioned in the Media Matters piece, not that it?s of any major significance, is that two of RightNetwork?s contributors?Dan Collins and Joy McCann?jumped overboard and, sadder but no wiser, started up their own conservative group blog and news site, The Conservatory, which does update frequently, providing fresh stale content for unchoosy readers.

Source: http://www.vanityfair.com/content/vanityfair/online/wolcott/2011/08/voyage-to-the-bottom-of-see-ya--later

Jimmy Carter Dick Cheney Barack Obama George Soros Aung San Suu Kyi

Becoming a Bigot in Three Easy Steps

Noemie Emery, DC Examiner

Source: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2011/08/31/becoming_a_bigot_in_three_easy_steps_262643.html

Hugo Chavez Dick Cheney Noam Chomsky Bill Clinton Hillary Clinton

Watching a Green Fiction Unravel

Source: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2011/08/31/watching_a_green_fiction_unravel_262618.html

Ralph Nader Saparmurat Niyazov Ehud Olmert Ron Paul Colin Powell

Advertisement:

We were unable to forward you to the advertisement you clicked on.

The likely cause for this is that your browser, feed reader, or email application is configured to not accept cookies, or your reader may launch an external browser to view links without sharing cookies.

  • If you're using Internet Explorer, make sure your privacy setting is at medium or below.
    • Select 'Internet Options' from the 'Tools' menu in your browser window
    • Click the Privacy tab
    • Adjust your privacy setting if necessary
  • If you're using a reader that embeds Internet Explorer (examples: Microsoft Outlook, Outlook Express, Feed Demon), you'll also need to select Internet Explorer as your default web browser.
    • Open Internet Explorer
    • Select 'Internet Options' from the 'Tools' menu in your browser window
    • Click the 'Programs' tab and check the box for Internet Explorer to check if it is the default browser and save your change
    • Close your browser, re-open it, and when prompted, select Internet Explorer as your default
    • You can then click on an ad in your newsletter and visit the site you wish to view


Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement | WordPress Tutorials

Source: http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=0cf15e47d8ee791f01737d5b0399c8c3&p=4

Bill Frist Newt Gingrich Rudolph Giuliani Al Gore Chuck Hagel

Stephen Bates diary

The sound of knives being sharpened can only mean one thing ? it's political memoir season

? Ah, the season of mellow fruitfulness draws on, nights close in, and that strange scraping sound we can hear is the knives of the political memoir season being sharpened. First off the presses this year is Alistair Darling, with yet more grisly details about his dysfunctional former boss. What a nest of vipers it must have been and lo, here's the obscure and largely forgotten figure of Shriti Vadera, who was awarded a peerage by Gordon Brown in order that she could become, briefly, a junior minister. She is someone who, according to Darling, was "only happy when there was blood on the floor, preferably that of her colleagues". That may well be true: not a woman to suffer even bright fools gladly, Treasury folk recall her stock of Commons champagne, dispensed to assuage those who had felt the rough edge of her tongue. Interesting to think of champagne as a universal emollient for hurt feelings, but then she did come from a City background, and has returned to it with consultancy roles in Dubai and Singapore to add to several directorships. Champagne probably does not go amiss there, either.

? Axes being ground, too, in the Church of England ? when are they not? ? with vicarage gossip about who might succeed the archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams, should a bus be unforgiving enough to run him down or he himself decide to retire to become an anchorite clinging to a small rock off the coast of Wales. Word is that John Sentamu, the archbishop of York ? who has been severely ill with appendicitis this summer ? would be ambitious for the job, a thought to make many bishops blanch, since they rate his abilities rather lower than he does himself. And it is said that Richard Chartres, bishop of London and third in line of seniority, might back Sentamu if only to make sure he is not appointed, and Chartres himself would then gain the primacy. Positively Trollopean and surely wrong-headed, except that it is being circulated by some senior clergy. Such febrility is anyway surely unnecessary, as Rowan still has another nine years before he need retire and both Sentamu and Chartres are older than he is. If he were to go he would be, in Harold Wilson's felicitous phrase on being succeeded by Jim Callaghan, making way for an older man.

? Flap, flap, over the Channel from Brussels comes the latest scare story: the EU wants to spend ?2m researching homeopathic medicines for animals. Staggering, outrageous, an insult to taxpayers, say the British Tories. "To waste millions on highly questionable new-age remedies for cows and sheep is sheer madness," says MEP Richard Ashworth. It is quite a lot, though scarcely a dent in the ?50bn common agricultural policy. The British Veterinary Association says it would quite like the investment, and the Soil Association is keen, though as Ashworth probably knows, the chances of the item passing through all the hoops it needs to are pretty remote.

? The amusingly named Kunt and the Gang, a comedy duo based in Basildon, where the inhabitants probably need something to laugh at, have had to apologise for going round Edinburgh during the festival sticking penis-shaped cutouts advertising their show in suggestive positions on posters of other artistes. They were apparently warned of legal action, and an even more direct assault by another comic who threatened physical violence. "I sincerely apologise if one of my cocks got up anyone's nose," said Mr Kunt, flaccidly. Probably best to stick to the decent obscurity of the comedy circuits in Tiverton and Baldock, where they are next due to perform.

? Fourteen years to the day since Princess Diana's death and the Daily Express's royal correspondent can find only 30 pilgrims paying their respects outside Kensington Palace. Perhaps it is time for even his paper to move on: after all, its former editor Peter Hill once declared that "the weather is the new Diana" as far as stories are concerned, so surely there'll be a storm along in a bit to splash on.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2011/aug/31/stephen-bates-diary-alistair-darling

Aung San Suu Kyi

Lucky George?

The chancellor seems to be doing a vanishing act

Where is George Osborne? The economy is losing altitude and yet the pilot has vanished. His minders say he remains in the cockpit and is in full control. Passengers, already upset by the bumpy ride, are not so sure. Why no appearances on Question Time, Newsnight or Channel 4 news? What is he scared of?

Maybe he will turn out to be the lucky chancellor. Certainly the ONS did him a favour with its change to the accounting rules governing Labour's mobile phone 3G licence sale in 2000.

A decision to add �1bn to the accounts over 21 years has been overturned in favour of booking the whole �21bn bonanza in the first year. That means Osborne's deficit reduction plan (with a 2015 finishing date) will benefit from �6bn that was due to be entered in the accounts in the six years before 2021.

Add an estimated �20bn gain on the purchase of government bonds since the banking crash, which is yet to be included in the accounts, and you have a cut in the deficit worth not much less than the entire tax credit bill for last year (�23bn). Who needs a growing economy when you have paper profits from asset sales?


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/aug/31/viewpoint-george-osborne

Nelson Mandela Paul Martin John McCain Evo Morales William Mountbatten-Windsor

Pitfalls of political funding reforms

Two major potential abuses are left open by the proposed reform of party funding by the committee on standards in public life (Cap on donations could cost Labour dear, 30 August). One is the influence of banks. Although donations are to be controlled, there will be no control on loans. Loans are a large issue ? Labour is �10m in debt, the Tories �2.6m. The ability to make loans not only buys influence directly but also longer-term, by making parties beholden to debt. The need to repay loans, at a given time, may make parties susceptible to influence.

Second, the proposed limit on donations from any single donor would not stop structured finance from linked groups. A hot issue in US politics is the influence of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. Endorsement by Aipac does not bring candidates a large single donation from Aipac itself but rather a number of donations from related organisations ? yet the net effect is a well-organised funding machine, worth millions, with considerable political influence. The political legitimacy of Aipac is not at issue but it shows how any large source of finance could be structured to circumvent the proposed rules.

The standards committee proposes an impartial state body should provide parties' funding instead of large individual donors, although even this will skew and dictate the "rules of politics". Parties have become dependant on funding to support expensive PR campaigns because they have rapidly dwindling membership ? with no one to conduct canvassing. Would it be right for public funding to perpetuate this? Shouldn't the political success of parties depend on public support rather than public funding?

Nathan Allonby

North Shields, Tyne and Wear


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2011/aug/31/donor-effect-political-funding

Mike Huckabee Saddam Hussein Hu Jintao Kim Jong Il Islam Karimov

GOP Tantrum Throwers vs. President Obama

Steve Kornacki, Salon
It's not surprising that President Obama is getting ready to launch a new job creation push. The economy is showing virtually no signs of life, his approval rating is falling to new lows, and with the next election just over a year away, his chances of being a one-termer are increasing with every piece of bad economic news. So sometime next week, Obama will unveil his plan in a prime-time speech, although some hints of what he may propose are now starting to leak out.What would be surprising -- shocking, actually -- is if his push resulted in any meaningful jobs legislation being...

Source: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2011/08/31/gop_tantrum_throwers_vs_president_obama_262597.html

King Abdulla Osama bin Laden Tony Blair Sam Brownback Laura Bush

AP IMPACT: Pakistani Fertilizer Fuels Afghan Bombs

In this Aug. 25, 2011 photo, a Pakistani dealer holds fertilizer containing ammonium nitrate in Multan, Pakistan. The U.S. government believes that most of the bombs killing its troops in Afghanistan are made with a chemical fertilizer produced by a single company in Pakistan and American officials have launched an intense and so far unsuccessful push for regulation.
Associated Press

In this Aug. 25, 2011 photo, a Pakistani dealer holds fertilizer containing ammonium nitrate in Multan, Pakistan. The U.S. government believes that most of the bombs killing its troops in Afghanistan are made with a chemical fertilizer produced by a single company in Pakistan and American officials have launched an intense and so far unsuccessful push for regulation.

In this photo taken on Aug 25, 2011, a Pakistani worker carries a sack of fertilizer containing ammonium nitrate in Multan, Pakistan. The U.S. government believes that most of the bombs killing its troops in Afghanistan are made with a chemical fertilizer produced by a single company in Pakistan and American officials have launched an intense and so far unsuccessful push for regulation.
Enlarge Associated Press

In this photo taken on Aug 25, 2011, a Pakistani worker carries a sack of fertilizer containing ammonium nitrate in Multan, Pakistan. The U.S. government believes that most of the bombs killing its troops in Afghanistan are made with a chemical fertilizer produced by a single company in Pakistan and American officials have launched an intense and so far unsuccessful push for regulation.

Associated Press

In this photo taken on Aug 25, 2011, a Pakistani worker carries a sack of fertilizer containing ammonium nitrate in Multan, Pakistan. The U.S. government believes that most of the bombs killing its troops in Afghanistan are made with a chemical fertilizer produced by a single company in Pakistan and American officials have launched an intense and so far unsuccessful push for regulation.

In this Aug. 25, 2011 photo, trucks loaded with bags of fertilizer are parked outside the Pakarab fertilizer factory in Multan, Pakistan. The U.S. government believes that most of the bombs killing its troops in Afghanistan are made with a chemical fertilizer produced by a single company in Pakistan, Pakarab Fertilizer Ltd, and American officials have launched an intense and so far unsuccessful...
Associated Press

In this Aug. 25, 2011 photo, trucks loaded with bags of fertilizer are parked outside the Pakarab fertilizer factory in Multan, Pakistan. The U.S. government believes that most of the bombs killing its troops in Afghanistan are made with a chemical fertilizer produced by a single company in Pakistan, Pakarab Fertilizer Ltd, and American officials have launched an intense and so far unsuccessful push for regulation.

In this July 26, 2011 photo, a Pakistani man carries sacks of fertilizer to smuggle into neighboring Afghanistan at Pakistani border town of Chaman. The U.S. government believes that most of the bombs killing its troops in Afghanistan are made with a chemical fertilizer produced by a single company in Pakistan and American officials have launched an intense and so far unsuccessful push for regu...
Associated Press

In this July 26, 2011 photo, a Pakistani man carries sacks of fertilizer to smuggle into neighboring Afghanistan at Pakistani border town of Chaman. The U.S. government believes that most of the bombs killing its troops in Afghanistan are made with a chemical fertilizer produced by a single company in Pakistan and American officials have launched an intense and so far unsuccessful push for regulation.

In this July 27, 2011 photo, sacks of fertilizer are held in wheelbarrows at Pakistani Chaman border post to be smuggled into the neighboring Afghanistan. The U.S. government believes that most of the bombs killing its troops in Afghanistan are made with a chemical fertilizer produced by a single company in Pakistan and American officials have launched an intense and so far unsuccessful push fo...
Associated Press

In this July 27, 2011 photo, sacks of fertilizer are held in wheelbarrows at Pakistani Chaman border post to be smuggled into the neighboring Afghanistan. The U.S. government believes that most of the bombs killing its troops in Afghanistan are made with a chemical fertilizer produced by a single company in Pakistan and American officials have launched an intense and so far unsuccessful push for regulation.

The main ingredient in most of the homemade bombs that have killed hundreds of American troops in Afghanistan is fertilizer produced by a single company in Pakistan, where the U.S. has been pushing unsuccessfully for greater regulation.

Enough calcium ammonium nitrate fertilizer for at least 140,000 bombs was legally produced last year by Pakarab Fertilizers Ltd., then smuggled by militants and their suppliers across the porous border into southern and eastern Afghanistan, according to U.S. officials.

The U.S. military says around 80 percent of Afghan bombs are made with the fertilizer, which becomes a powerful explosive when mixed with fuel oil. The rest are made from military-grade munitions like mines or shells.

The United States began talks a year and a half ago with Pakistani officials and Pakarab, one of the country's largest companies. But there is still no regulation of distribution and sale of calcium ammonium nitrate fertilizer.

"If you have a host country that has a factory making a substance that ultimately becomes the problem, then that country has to contribute at least half the solution," said Democratic Sen. Bob Casey of Pennsylvania, who led a congressional delegation to Pakistan last week to press army and civilian leaders for action.

U.S. officials say Pakistan and Pakarab have expressed willingness to regulate the fertilizer, which is also widely used in the manufacture of bombs used by insurgents to kill thousands of soldiers and civilians inside Pakistan. They acknowledge the difficulties: 15 years after ammonium nitrate was used in the Oklahoma City bombings, the U.S. government only presented its proposals to regulate it on Aug. 2.

But with the death toll from homemade bombs rising almost daily inside Afghanistan, continuing inaction by Pakistani authorities will add more strain to a U.S.-Pakistani relationship already frayed by allegations that Islamabad is aiding Afghan insurgents on its side of the border.

"This is a test," Casey said. "The key thing now is to see results."

????

The only producer of calcium ammonium nitrate fertilizer in Pakistan, Pakarab operates two factories in Punjab province, the country's agricultural heartland.

The largest is on the outskirts of Multan, an ancient city surrounded by thousands of acres (hectares) of mango orchards and cotton fields. A sprawling industrial complex of smoking chimneys, pipes and tanks surrounded by high walls, the 39-year-old facility churns out the chemical 24 hours a day when it's operating.

Lines of trucks wait outside to transport sacks of fertilizer to 2,000 distributors around the country, who then sell it to millions of Pakistani cotton, fruit and wheat farmers.

Around Multan, dealers sit in small shops in front of piled-up sacks of ammonium nitrate and other fertilizer, haggling with farmers. Most say they are aware ammonium nitrate can be used as an explosive, but none has been told to report suspicious purchases.

Pakistani fertilizer producers are not permitted to export to Afghanistan because they are subsidized by the government and their products are meant for domestic use only. But the low price of fertilizer in Pakistan, and a chronic shortage in Afghanistan, has meant that smuggling has long been rife.

The chemical, known as CAN, is often trucked into southern Afghanistan repackaged as a harmless fertilizer. Other times, it's hidden under other goods, often after border guards have been paid a bribe, according to smugglers at the Chaman border and U.S. officials.

One dealer, Mohammad Wassem, told The Associated Press wealthy people with links to the insurgents placed orders for all three fertilizers produced by Pakarab. They sold the two safer varieties domestically, then trucked the ammonium nitrate across the border.

Truck driver Ali Jan said he makes $20 each time he crosses the border with concealed sacks of fertilizer.

"I do not take banned items every time, but I make at least 10 trips a month across the border carrying bags of fertilizer under other stuff," Jan said.

Only a tiny fraction of the trucks that cross the border are searched, said one U.S. official, explaining it would be impractical to stop and search the many thousands of vehicles that cross the border each day.

??????

Explosives can be made from a range of fertilizers, but it is easy to turn CAN into a bomb. Insurgents either grind or boil the small, off-white granules to separate the calcium from the nitrate, which is mixed with fuel oil, packed into a jug or box and then detonated.

The fertilizer is sold in 110-pound (50-kilogram) sacks, which can be used to make between two and four bombs depending on whether they are targeting vehicles or foot patrols, said Robin Best, an expert at the U.S. military's Joint IED Defeat Organization, who visited the Multan factory in July with a U.S. delegation.

Such bombs, typically buried and detonated remotely or by pressure plates, have killed more than 719 Americans and wounded more than 7,440 since the conflict began in 2001, along with thousands of Afghan troops and civilians. Last year's U.S. death toll ? 252 ? was as high as the two previous years combined, and 2011 is shaping up to be just as bloody.

Based on tests of residues at a limited number of blast sites, and seizures of the chemical inside Afghanistan, two U.S. officials told the AP they believe the majority of fertilizer bombs in Afghanistan are made of CAN produced by Pakarab. One said that up to 80 percent of the bombs were made with Pakarab fertilizer. Both asked for anonymity because of the sensitivity of the data.

Casey, the senator from Pennsylvania, said the U.S. government estimates around 1 percent of Pakarab's annual production made it ways across the border for use in bombmaking. Given that the company produced 350,000 metric tons in 2010, that means enough for at least 140,000 bombs was smuggled across the frontier last year, though an unknown amount was seized by Afghan and U.S. authorities, or stockpiled.

On Aug. 17, authorities in Afghanistan's Helmand province said they seized 200 sacks of ammonium nitrate that had been smuggled from Pakistan. Photos of the sacks, which had been partially buried, showed they were made by Pakarab.

"All of this chemical is coming from the south and the east," said Mohammad Zahir Azimi, a spokesman for the Afghan Defense Ministry. "We want Pakistan to control it."

Executives of Pakarab, a publicly traded company, defended their right to sell what is a legal product well-suited to the soil and weather in Pakistan. They said the company had no way to dispute U.S. and Afghan claims about where its fertilizer is ending up, but noted ammonium nitrate was produced in other countries around the region and that Pakistan also imported it.

"Pakarab will continue to work with both the (U.S. and Pakistani) governments unreservedly," the company said in a statement.

The company added that Washington had provided assurances it had no plans to press for the plants to be closed.

????

Most countries have placed restrictions on the sale, purchase and storage of the chemical, and some, including Germany, Afghanistan, Ireland and China, have banned it. Some U.S. states already regulate it, but new federal proposals would require those who purchase and sell it to register with the government and limit its movement across states.

The U.S. is discussing similar kinds of regulations in Pakistan, but acknowledges that enforcement will be difficult in a country where police and government officials are underpaid, lack education and are facing numerous other challenges.

Still, there are signs that Pakistan may not fully understand the problem or lack the ability to address it.

After a meeting with Sen. Casey, Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani issued a statement saying the government had already introduced "strict laws" regulating the product, implying that nothing further needed to be done. An army spokesman even maintained there were no longer any factories producing calcium ammonium nitrate in Pakistan, before being corrected by the AP.

"I don't think the magnitude of the problem has been understood," said a U.S. official, who asked not to be named to discuss the issue frankly. "There hasn't been a comprehensive look (by Pakistan) at it. We are having frank discussions. We are taking that as progress."

Casey said he hoped new regulations to control the product could be in place as soon as the end of the fall.

The U.S. has also been trying to get Pakarab to switch to producing a version of the fertilizer that's more difficult to turn into bombs ? something scientists have been trying to accomplish since the use of nitrate fertilizers was pioneered by Irish Republican militants in the 1980s.

Last year, executives with the U.S. chemical manufacturer Honeywell traveled to Pakistan to pitch Pakarab on the merits of Sulf-N 26, a fertilizer that combines ammonium nitrate with ammonium sulfate, a fertilizer and fire retardant.

Honeywell unveiled Sulf-N 26 in 2008 in response to security concerns after the Oklahoma City bombing, and bills it as safe as sand when mixed with fuel.

However, tests carried out in the U.S. showed it could still be used in the production of bombs and the project was shelved, according to Pakarab and Best, the expert at the Joint IED Defeat Organization. Honeywell, which said it had not been informed about the tests, disputed that conclusion.

Pakarab is now testing the feasibility of dyeing CAN to distinguish it from other harmless fertilizers at the border.

Such a process has never been tried before. Pakarab said the dyeing initiative was "encouraging."

"The dye is a huge thing. It's the first step that could have a profound impact," Best said.

One concern is whether farmers, most of whom are illiterate and resistant to change, would buy the dyed product, Best said. He said Pakarab was planning a marketing campaign to inform them that its quality remained the same, or possibly better, with the addition of extra chemicals.

While calcium ammonium nitrate accounts for just 10 percent of fertilizer sales across Pakistan, it accounts for most of the fertilizer produced by Pakarab. The company's sales of CAN grew by 20 percent in 2010 from a year earlier, and the company continues to aggressively market it.

Pakarab made $104 million in profit last year, and has hired BNY Mellon to help it become the first Pakistan-based company to sell shares on U.S. stock markets.

?????

Associated Press Writers Deb Riechmann in Kabul and Matiullah Acakzai in Chaman contributed to this report.



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement | WordPress Tutorials

Source: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=140092637&ft=1&f=

Barack Obama George Soros Aung San Suu Kyi Queen Elizabeth II King Abdullah

Obama's Economic-Policy Last Chance

Tony Blankley, Washington Times
President Obama's post-Labor Day "jobs" speech will be his last chance to launch an economic policy with any chance of manifesting its effect - both economic and political - before the November 2012 elections. He has three options. In order of descending likelihood, they are: a timid hodgepodge of previous proposals, a bold left-of-center initiative or a turn to a free-market “nuclear option.”It’s that nuclear option that is the most fascinating (and most unlikely). He could decide to embrace all the major Republican, Tea Party free-market ideas -...

Source: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2011/08/31/obamas_economic-policy_last_chance_111135.html

Hillary Clinton Tom DeLay Elizabeth Dole John Edwards Dianne Feinstein

A Second Credit Crash Is Totally Possible

Jon Markman, MarketWatch
Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke tried his best to act like the perfect host in Wyoming last week, telling a symposium of central bankers and the news media that all was well in the world, everything was under control, and there was no need for new measures. Git along, little dogies, and don’t look behind the curtain.Yet something seemed wrong in the forced bonhomie Bernanke tried to project with his Continental counterpart, Jean-Claude Trichet — and I’m not even talking about the mismatched shirt and sweater the tall Frenchman sported.

Source: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2011/08/31/a_second_credit_crash_is_totally_possible_262624.html

Joe Biden John Boehner Sarah Palin Sean Hannity Harry Reid

Obama set to deliver September 7 economic address to Congress

Washington (CNN) -- President Barack Obama requested time Wednesday to deliver an economic address to a joint session of Congress on the evening of September 7 -- a prime-time platform to unveil his long-awaited jobs proposal.

The speech is set to be delivered at 8 p.m. ET.

"Our nation faces unprecedented economic challenges, and millions of hardworking Americans continue to look for jobs," Obama said in a letter sent to House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada.

"As I have traveled across our country this summer and spoken with our fellow Americans, I have heard a consistent message: Washington needs to put aside politics and start making decisions based on what is best for our country and not what is best for each of our parties in order to grow the economy and create jobs. We must answer this call."

The national unemployment rate currently stands at 9.1% -- a figure all but ensuring that the state of the fragile economy will remain the dominant issue of the 2012 presidential campaign.



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement | WordPress Tutorials

Source: http://rss.cnn.com/~r/rss/cnn_allpolitics/~3/h_tkI15-_5U/index.html

Duchess of Cornwall Robert Mugabe Ralph Nader Saparmurat Niyazov Ehud Olmert

Vince Cable: disingenuous bankers are trying to derail reforms

Banking sector using economic turmoil to argue against regulatory change, says business secretary

Vince Cable has accused bankers of using the economic turmoil in Europe to try to derail reform of the financial sector.

The business secretary said that "louder and louder voices" were being raised among some of the big British banks giving warning that regulatory change in Britain would put the recovery at risk.

The Independent Commission on Banking is expected to recommend separating banks' retail operations from their investment arms when it reports on 12 September.

There have been attacks on the proposals from the director general of the CBI, John Cridland, and British Bankers' Association's chief executive, Angela Knight.

Cridland has said taking action to reform the banks now would be "barking mad", while Knight warned imposing the measures on lenders risked denting confidence and cutting the supply of credit.

However, Cable said in an interview with the Times that the fact that there were still fears about the collapse of big financial institutions was "all the more reason for grappling with this issue".

"It is disingenuous in the extreme to use the current context to argue against reform. Banks are in a way trying to create a panic around something which they know has got to happen," he said.

Cable has long favoured the separation of retail and investment banking. He added: "The governor of the Bank of England and many other people have been arguing that we have to deal with the 'too big to fail' problem. We can't have big global banks with balance sheets bigger than British GDP underwritten by the taxpayer; this can't go on and it has got to be dealt with."

The business secretary also said that he did not expect another 2008-style meltdown in the banking sector, but acknowledged that difficulties could still lie ahead for the British economy.

"To my mind, the greater worry is not a massive financial crisis again but it is a general slowing down of western economies, with all the problems that presents for employment and long-term dynamism," said Cable.

In comments reported in the Financial Times, Cridland had said: "Taking action at this moment ? this moment of growth peril, which weakens the ability of banks in Britain to provide the finance that businesses need to grow ? is just to me barking mad."

He added that a perceived political need for action after banks were bailed out in 2008 was driving the scale and pace of reform, and warned that "there's an own goal here about to be scored if we get this wrong".


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2011/aug/31/vince-cable-bankers-reforms

Condoleezza Rice Bill Richardson Mitt Romney Karl Rove Rick Santorum

Never Provoke a Dominatrix

That?s one of the maxims I live by, and so far it?s spared me ever so much soothing ointment.

But not everybody follows this piece of peasant wisdom?perhaps they like to live dangerously, or consider themselves invulnerable, who knows?and one journalistic rogue has now invited the sting of mistress?s lash. Cue the whipcrack from Frankie Laine?s theme song for Rawhide:

Chancellor was targeted by News of the World's hacker, says dominatrix

I hasten to mention that the Chancellor in question is not Alexander Chancellor, the former editor of The Spectator (UK) and Talk of the Town editor at The New Yorker. Very nice chap, as I recall.

No, this is the Chancellor of the Exchequer of which we speak.

A former dominatrix was targeted by the News of the World's phone hacker Glenn Mulcaire in a tabloid scramble to publish a picture of her posing with George Osborne in front of an alleged line of cocaine, The Independentcan reveal.

Natalie Rowe, 47, a former madam who supplied prostitutes to a moneyed clientele, has been shown documents by Scotland Yard detectives showing that the hacker obtained details of her mobile phone number and information about at least one of Mr Osborne's circle of close friends, as newspapers investigated claims of drug use at the height of David Cameron's Conservative leadership bid in 2005.

[snip]

Mark Lewis, the lawyer acting for Ms Rowe who now works as a writer and has completed an autobiography which she says will make incendiary revelations about former clients in the upper echelons of the Conservative Party, is preparing a damages claims against News International after it became clear that she was targeted by Mr Mulcaire at a time when she was co-operating with the NOTW's chief rival, the Sunday Mirror.

Ms. Rowe?s book sounds like it will be quite a stocking stuffer and reading the details of her story I was reminded of a new novel set in our own fallen country in which politics and sadomasochism interlace like a leather restrainer (unless, of course, it incorporates a zipper): The Knot Artist, whose heroine is dominatrix who runs a dungeon for wealthy, powerful masochists for whom vanilla is not enough. If you?ve ever wanted to enter a dungeon without having foreign objects inserted up your butt, here is a novel that will give you a virtual tour.

That?s one of the maxims I live by, and so far it?s spared me ever so much soothing ointment.

But not everybody follows this piece of peasant wisdom?perhaps they like to live dangerously, or consider themselves invulnerable, who knows?and one journalistic rogue has now invited the sting of mistress?s lash. Cue the whipcrack from Frankie Laine?s theme song for Rawhide:

Chancellor was targeted by News of the World's hacker, says dominatrix

I hasten to mention that the Chancellor in question is not Alexander Chancellor, the former editor of The Spectator (UK) and Talk of the Town editor at The New Yorker. Very nice chap, as I recall.

No, this is the Chancellor of the Exchequer of which we speak.

A former dominatrix was targeted by the News of the World's phone hacker Glenn Mulcaire in a tabloid scramble to publish a picture of her posing with George Osborne in front of an alleged line of cocaine, The Independentcan reveal.

Natalie Rowe, 47, a former madam who supplied prostitutes to a moneyed clientele, has been shown documents by Scotland Yard detectives showing that the hacker obtained details of her mobile phone number and information about at least one of Mr Osborne's circle of close friends, as newspapers investigated claims of drug use at the height of David Cameron's Conservative leadership bid in 2005.

[snip]

Mark Lewis, the lawyer acting for Ms Rowe who now works as a writer and has completed an autobiography which she says will make incendiary revelations about former clients in the upper echelons of the Conservative Party, is preparing a damages claims against News International after it became clear that she was targeted by Mr Mulcaire at a time when she was co-operating with the NOTW's chief rival, the Sunday Mirror.

Ms. Rowe?s book sounds like it will be quite a stocking stuffer and reading the details of her story I was reminded of a new novel set in our own fallen country in which politics and sadomasochism interlace like a leather restrainer (unless, of course, it incorporates a zipper): The Knot Artist, whose heroine is dominatrix who runs a dungeon for wealthy, powerful masochists for whom vanilla is not enough. If you?ve ever wanted to enter a dungeon without having foreign objects inserted up your butt, here is a novel that will give you a virtual tour.

Source: http://www.vanityfair.com/content/vanityfair/online/wolcott/2011/08/never-provoke-a-dominatrix

Henry Kissinger Dennis Kucinich Nelson Mandela Paul Martin John McCain

In the Evo-Stik, fans can still tell a team from a business | John Harris

If Premier League football is a cash-dominated farce, the rebellious optimism of supporter-owned clubs points to an alternative

'Top-level football looks exactly like a small globalised economy," offered one Comment is free user, and they didn't mean it as a compliment. "There is something inherently messed up about a competition that starts each year with 20 teams but only three or four of them ever have the potential to actually win," reckoned someone else. We had asked Cifers for their opinions about life in the game's less star-spangled layers ? and inevitably, just about everyone was agreed on something so built into the national conversation that it seems to be a matter of firm consensus: that notwithstanding such jaw-droppers as Manchester United thrashing Arsenal 8-2, big money is so distorting the game that its upper tiers seem to have precious little to do with the unpredictable glories of great sport.

Of late, Uefa has introduced financial fair play rules aimed at forcing big clubs to break even and limit their spending; but plenty of sceptical voices still see the future of high-end football belonging to such teams as Chelsea, Manchester City ? and FC Anzhi Makhachkala. Thanks to a local oligarch named Suleyman Kerimov, the Dagestan club have just signed Samuel Eto'o from Inter Milan for �22m and are paying him �330,000 a week to make sporting life in an unstable region just south of Chechnya that bit more palatable.

Meanwhile, whether new constraints on the sport's aristocracy work or not, in the case of scores of British clubs all that matters is simple survival. The super-teams of the Premier League tower over them, offering a kind of infinite gratification with which the stoicism of traditional football fandom can't compete. Falling into administration is an ongoing threat. But as an evening at the home ground of Chester FC proves, some clubs are brimming with a new kind of rebellious optimism. "Coming here is actually better than the Premier League," one fan tells me; that might be pushing it, but I can just about see his point.

Until the spring of 2010, the local team here were called Chester City. Founded in 1885, their history contained little more auspicious than once reaching the semi-finals of the League Cup, and in the TV age the success enjoyed by Liverpool sucked away their support. Towards the end of their existence, they were bedeviled by textbook mishap: a �7m debt, administration, an owner since ruled out of the game according to the Football Association's "fit and proper" regulations ? and expulsion from the Conference League in February 2010. The club was formally liquidated a month later.

But those who wanted football to carry on here acted admirably quickly, and launched the new Chester FC as a "phoenix club". Crucially, it's a mutual: owned by its supporters, who can pay a minimum of �5 a season to become active shareholders. And it is not alone: the night I watched them play, their opponents in the Evo-Stik League premier division were the fan-owned FC United Of Manchester, founded in protest against the debt-laden misrule of the Glazer family. There is also AFC Wimbledon ? whose fans took similar umbrage at their old club's move to Milton Keynes and are now back in the Football League ? and, among others, Brentford, Exeter City, Cambridge City, and good old Runcorn Linnets.

Built around these teams is an ecosystem of support and sympathetic research. Supporters Direct, the body originally set up by the last government to encourage more accountable sports clubs, not only advises and lobbies but runs its own cup and pre-season shield competitions. The momentum they've acquired led to a pledge to encourage "co-operative ownership of football clubs by supporters" in last year's coalition agreement, though insiders say they now want some appreciable action. They're pushing for tax relief for fan-owned clubs. As soon as it becomes law, they want government and local authorities to aggressively use the provisions of the localism bill to identify football clubs as assets of community value, thus opening the way for mutualised local ownership. More generally, they're pushing for a sports law that will recognise that clubs amount to much more than privately owned businesses, and toughen the regulation on who can own them.

Back inside Chester's Exacta Stadium, the last 20 minutes was a bit of a thriller: the home team holding on to a 2-1 lead, though FC United constantly threatened to come back ? all of which underlines the fact that in the absence of Sky TV cameras, those fabled prawn sandwiches and big money, the game's essential thrills might actually be easier to experience. The 3,219 fans who turned up created a fantastically infectious atmosphere.

Incidentally, this coming Saturday will see no Premier League or Championship fixtures, because of international matches ? and has been craftily rebranded by grassroots football activists as "non-league day". The online blurb exhorts "all football fans to watch their local non-league side play, providing both a boost to grassroots football and a new experience for fans used to the upper echelons of the game".

If you're troubled by the idea that big-time football has now become a cash?dominated farce, you should think about trying it. And if you need further encouragement, consider these words, posted on Cif by a disciple of Weymouth FC, currently doing their thing in the Evo-Stik southern premier division. "There are no poncy egos here. That nippy right-winger you idolise from the terraces? You'll see him the next day emptying your bin."


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/30/evo-stik-premier-league-grassroots

Rev. Al Sharpton Than Shwe Aung San Suu Kyi Yulia Tymoshenko Elizabeth Windsor

Gullible?s Travels

It is a sober day indeed in which Robert Stacy McCain, he of the Front Page fedora and vulpine grin (where?s Lee Tracy when we need him?), sounds like the Voice of Reason.

But in the baby alligator pool of postmodern conservatism, any glimmer of common sense and rational analysis seems like an intruder, and so it is with McCain?s objection to Sarah Palin stringing her fans along and stoking them into a frustrated frenzy like Madeleine Kahn working the stage in Blazing Saddles.

This reality ? that the clock has run out on any realistic prospect of a Palin 2012 campaign ? is one I hesitate to mention, for fear of offending those of her supporters who continue to hold out hope that Palin will mount a last-minute blitz campaign for the White House. While I don?t doubt that Mama Grizzly could do that, I have seen no indication that she will do that, and have been puzzled by her refusal to say definitively that she won?t do that.

Consider this: With all the assets at his disposal, Texas Gov. Rick Perry spent more than two months building the campaign machinery necessary to officially launch his presidential campaign in mid-August. So if Palin were to begin such an effort tomorrow ? and there is no tangible evidence she?s planning anything of the kind ? the earliest she could jump into the 2012 race would be mid-October, by which time many of those grassroots volunteers who might have supported her will have already committed to other campaigns.

By continuing to keep alive a tiny glimmering hope of her 2012 candidacy, long after the point when the whole ?testing the waters? time-frame has passed its sell-by date, Palin is setting up her True Believers for a bitter disillusionment whenever the time comes for her to officially admit that she?s not running [my bolding].

Although McCain had a few trifling details wrong in his post (which he concedes), it?s clear that a Palin presidential campaign is pure vaporware at this point and probably forever. Michele Bachmann has stepped into Palin?s role and so far looks like a steadier trouper, demented as her incandescent eyes and ideas may be. This doesn?t perturb Palin?s gullible base, whose open mouths await the fisherman?s hook. Organization, media relations, volunteer offices set up in the primary states, who needs ?em? Palin is running a new kind of ninja stealth campaign that leaves the past behind, one that is a big-screen projection from her mind onto the American political canvas. Or as one true-blue puts it in the comments section:

1) Palin is unlike any political personality ever to exist. She doesn't need the months of putting together a political organization others do. Between her own followers (Organized and otherwise) and Tea Party Groups (Organized and otherwise), she has hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions of ready-made "boots on the ground" throughout the nation.

2) When has Palin ever told us anything which has proven untrue about her intentions? She said , when she resigned, that she was going to keep fighting and bring that fight to the lower 48. She has done so. She said that she woul no longer give interviews to the LSM. [LSM: Lame-Stream Media, for those who don?t speak Palin.] She has not. Etc. Now she tells us that she will enter the race if there is no sufficiently conservative Republican alternative. The field is only NOW, with Perry's entrance, fully shaped.

3) She is aware that she is a polarizing figure. My God, how could she not? She knows that it will be difficult for her to win the general election - even against Obama/Carter. What she doesn't know is whether Mitt or Rick can - or Michelle, for that matter - and, of them, whom will  jump to the front of the primary pack. So, she's doing just what she said she would - watching, waiting, and making up her mind.

And then she?ll strike! Like a cobra on a mission from God!

What gets me is how fickle the Tea Party bloggers and conservative pundits are. You?d think that with Rick Perry now in the race, their dance card would be filled. Perry, Michele Bachmann, Herman Cain, Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich, Ron Paul, Mitt Romney--that?s as right-leaning a roster as the Republican Party has ever fielded, with only varying degrees of fervency and ideological rectitude between them. Perry?s campaign isn?t even a week old and already the righties are bored with their new toy, clamoring for yet another Jesus on horseback or a fresh pair of dreamy eyes or a substitute for Tony Soprano. This week alone we?ve seen renewed hard-ons for Paul Ryan and Chris Christie, a continuing saga that Daniel Larison has ably disposed of here and here (Christie). In a followup post, Larison writes:

Jon Huntsman hasn?t gained any traction for many reasons, but it didn?t help that he had to throw together a campaign at the last minute after he returned from China. It would be even more difficult for Christie or Ryan to pull together an organization on such short notice. The organizational challenges for any candidate are considerable. Urging Christie or Ryan to get into the race at this point is to invite them to humiliate themselves. Of course, if Republicans want someone with Romney?s reputation for executive competence without quite so many egregious deviations from the party line, and if they find that they can?t abide Rick Perry?s brashness and policy blunders, Huntsman would seem to be an obvious alternative, but he was ruled unacceptable even before he entered the race.

[snip]

Ross [Douhat] challenges critics of Christie and Ryan boosters to offer an alternative, but what I am saying is that there is no more time for an alternative to emerge. More to the point, both Christie and Ryan would disappoint their former boosters almost as soon as they entered, and in another few weeks we would be treated to a new round of columns calling for Jim DeMint or Sam Brownback (or whoever) to ride to the rescue. This brings us back to [Jonathan] Bernstein?s observation that Republicans are stuck with the field they have and the field they have is a reflection of the party. Whether or not it is the absolute best that the GOP can do, the field is now as good (or bad) as it is going to get.

And yet the burning yearning churning refuses to subside. As Eric Boehlert tweeted, encapsulating the Republican antsy pants:

POTUS is widely despised and cannot win in 2012. But yes, we're still auditioning candidates cuz we can't find 1 who beats him

*Pun courtesy of the late Jill Johnston

It is a sober day indeed in which Robert Stacy McCain, he of the Front Page fedora and vulpine grin (where?s Lee Tracy when we need him?), sounds like the Voice of Reason.

But in the baby alligator pool of postmodern conservatism, any glimmer of common sense and rational analysis seems like an intruder, and so it is with McCain?s objection to Sarah Palin stringing her fans along and stoking them into a frustrated frenzy like Madeleine Kahn working the stage in Blazing Saddles.

This reality ? that the clock has run out on any realistic prospect of a Palin 2012 campaign ? is one I hesitate to mention, for fear of offending those of her supporters who continue to hold out hope that Palin will mount a last-minute blitz campaign for the White House. While I don?t doubt that Mama Grizzly could do that, I have seen no indication that she will do that, and have been puzzled by her refusal to say definitively that she won?t do that.

Consider this: With all the assets at his disposal, Texas Gov. Rick Perry spent more than two months building the campaign machinery necessary to officially launch his presidential campaign in mid-August. So if Palin were to begin such an effort tomorrow ? and there is no tangible evidence she?s planning anything of the kind ? the earliest she could jump into the 2012 race would be mid-October, by which time many of those grassroots volunteers who might have supported her will have already committed to other campaigns.

By continuing to keep alive a tiny glimmering hope of her 2012 candidacy, long after the point when the whole ?testing the waters? time-frame has passed its sell-by date, Palin is setting up her True Believers for a bitter disillusionment whenever the time comes for her to officially admit that she?s not running [my bolding].

Although McCain had a few trifling details wrong in his post (which he concedes), it?s clear that a Palin presidential campaign is pure vaporware at this point and probably forever. Michele Bachmann has stepped into Palin?s role and so far looks like a steadier trouper, demented as her incandescent eyes and ideas may be. This doesn?t perturb Palin?s gullible base, whose open mouths await the fisherman?s hook. Organization, media relations, volunteer offices set up in the primary states, who needs ?em? Palin is running a new kind of ninja stealth campaign that leaves the past behind, one that is a big-screen projection from her mind onto the American political canvas. Or as one true-blue puts it in the comments section:

1) Palin is unlike any political personality ever to exist. She doesn't need the months of putting together a political organization others do. Between her own followers (Organized and otherwise) and Tea Party Groups (Organized and otherwise), she has hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions of ready-made "boots on the ground" throughout the nation.

2) When has Palin ever told us anything which has proven untrue about her intentions? She said , when she resigned, that she was going to keep fighting and bring that fight to the lower 48. She has done so. She said that she woul no longer give interviews to the LSM. [LSM: Lame-Stream Media, for those who don?t speak Palin.] She has not. Etc. Now she tells us that she will enter the race if there is no sufficiently conservative Republican alternative. The field is only NOW, with Perry's entrance, fully shaped.

3) She is aware that she is a polarizing figure. My God, how could she not? She knows that it will be difficult for her to win the general election - even against Obama/Carter. What she doesn't know is whether Mitt or Rick can - or Michelle, for that matter - and, of them, whom will  jump to the front of the primary pack. So, she's doing just what she said she would - watching, waiting, and making up her mind.

And then she?ll strike! Like a cobra on a mission from God!

What gets me is how fickle the Tea Party bloggers and conservative pundits are. You?d think that with Rick Perry now in the race, their dance card would be filled. Perry, Michele Bachmann, Herman Cain, Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich, Ron Paul, Mitt Romney--that?s as right-leaning a roster as the Republican Party has ever fielded, with only varying degrees of fervency and ideological rectitude between them. Perry?s campaign isn?t even a week old and already the righties are bored with their new toy, clamoring for yet another Jesus on horseback or a fresh pair of dreamy eyes or a substitute for Tony Soprano. This week alone we?ve seen renewed hard-ons for Paul Ryan and Chris Christie, a continuing saga that Daniel Larison has ably disposed of here and here (Christie). In a followup post, Larison writes:

Jon Huntsman hasn?t gained any traction for many reasons, but it didn?t help that he had to throw together a campaign at the last minute after he returned from China. It would be even more difficult for Christie or Ryan to pull together an organization on such short notice. The organizational challenges for any candidate are considerable. Urging Christie or Ryan to get into the race at this point is to invite them to humiliate themselves. Of course, if Republicans want someone with Romney?s reputation for executive competence without quite so many egregious deviations from the party line, and if they find that they can?t abide Rick Perry?s brashness and policy blunders, Huntsman would seem to be an obvious alternative, but he was ruled unacceptable even before he entered the race.

[snip]

Ross [Douhat] challenges critics of Christie and Ryan boosters to offer an alternative, but what I am saying is that there is no more time for an alternative to emerge. More to the point, both Christie and Ryan would disappoint their former boosters almost as soon as they entered, and in another few weeks we would be treated to a new round of columns calling for Jim DeMint or Sam Brownback (or whoever) to ride to the rescue. This brings us back to [Jonathan] Bernstein?s observation that Republicans are stuck with the field they have and the field they have is a reflection of the party. Whether or not it is the absolute best that the GOP can do, the field is now as good (or bad) as it is going to get.

And yet the burning yearning churning refuses to subside. As Eric Boehlert tweeted, encapsulating the Republican antsy pants:

POTUS is widely despised and cannot win in 2012. But yes, we're still auditioning candidates cuz we can't find 1 who beats him

*Pun courtesy of the late Jill Johnston

Source: http://www.vanityfair.com/content/vanityfair/online/wolcott/2011/08/gullible-s-travels

Dianne Feinstein Bill Frist Newt Gingrich Rudolph Giuliani Al Gore

A Premature Celebration in Libya

George Friedman, Stratfor
The war in Libya is over. More precisely, governments and media have decided that the war is over, despite the fact that fighting continues. The unfulfilled expectation of this war has consistently been that Moammar Gadhafi would capitulate when faced with the forces arrayed against him, and that his own forces would abandon him as soon as they saw that the war was lost. What was being celebrated last week, with presidents, prime ministers and the media proclaiming the defeat of Gadhafi, will likely be true in due course. The fact that it is not yet true does not detract from the...

Source: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2011/08/30/a_premature_celebration_in_libya_262533.html

Speaker Pelosi Tea Party Joe Biden John Boehner Sarah Palin

Gerard Pee'pardieu?

Say it ain?t so.

Norman Mailer once had a Gotterdammerung of a tinkle and made quite a messy splash in a Washington DC bathroom, but those were different times (the Sixties, to be precise), when we gave our heroes more leeway. Perhaps it wasn?t Depardieu creating a pool, perhaps he has been wronged by this report, but he?s a pretty hard guy to misidentify.

Say it ain?t so.

Norman Mailer once had a Gotterdammerung of a tinkle and made quite a messy splash in a Washington DC bathroom, but those were different times (the Sixties, to be precise), when we gave our heroes more leeway. Perhaps it wasn?t Depardieu creating a pool, perhaps he has been wronged by this report, but he?s a pretty hard guy to misidentify.

Source: http://www.vanityfair.com/content/vanityfair/online/wolcott/2011/08/gerard-pee-pardieu-

George H. W. Bush Jimmy Carter Fidel Castro Hugo Chavez Dick Cheney

Labour attacks NHS bill amendments

Three quarters of changes concern altering name of family doctor groups and may obscure more serious issues

More than three quarters of the 1,000 ministerial amendments to the government's flagship NHS bill involve changing the name of the new GP bodies to purchase treatment on behalf of the patients, it emerged on Tuesday.

Until this summer, the government had been pushing the idea that family doctors would form "consortia" to buy care. However, David Cameron's team of experts, the Future Forum, advocated a name change since "consortia" gave the impression that GPs would be too powerful in the coalition's new look NHS.

Instead GP consortia are to be called "clinical commissioning groups" and will have governing bodies with at least one nurse and one specialist doctor.

The result, say critics, is a bureaucratic nightmare with a slew of meaningless amendments which could obscure some potentially disastrous changes to the NHS bill, already the longest and most complex in the NHS's history. MPs are to vote on the final report stage in the Commons next week.

Since the government only allowed two weeks to vote on the new bill earlier this summer, many say detailed scrutiny will be needed in the Lords to unearth the full implications for patients. Labour believe only one in 10 changes will be "new" amendments.

John Healey, Labour's shadow health spokesman, said that "having allowed so little time for the health bill committee to scrutinise the repackaged NHS plans, this again shows David Cameron and his ministers looking to railroad their legislation through the Commons. MPs will get only two days to debate these amendments next week, as the prime minister and his deputy hope to square everything off before their party conferences."

The department of health confirmed that the name changes would be "more than 75%" of the changes to the NHS bill.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/aug/31/nhs-bill-amendments-mainly-name-changes

Hillary Clinton Bill Clinton Rudy Giuliani Jimmy Carter Dick Cheney

A Tax Reform to Kick-Start the Economy

Laurence Kotlikoff, Bloomberg

Source: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2011/08/30/a_tax_reform_to_kick-start_the_economy_262581.html

Rudolph Giuliani Al Gore Chuck Hagel Stephen Harper Dennis Hastert

Homelessness could spread to middle class, Crisis study warns

Homelessness charity points to direct link between economic downturn and welfare cuts, and rising numbers living on streets

The economic downturn and the government's deep cuts to welfare will drive up homelessness over the next few years, raising the spectre of middle class people living on the streets, a major study warns.

The report by the homelessness charity Crisis, seen by the Guardian, says there is a direct link between the downturn and rising homelessness as cuts to services and draconian changes to benefits shred the traditional welfare safety net.

In the 120-page study, co-authored by academics at the University of York and Heriot-Watt University, Crisis highlights figures released over the summer that show councils have reported 44,160 people accepted as homeless and placed in social housing, an increase of 10% on the previous year and the first increase in almost a decade.

Last year another 189,000 people were also placed in temporary accommodation ? such as small hotels and B&Bs ? to prevent them from becoming homeless, an increase of 14% on the previous year.

Crisis says that with no sign of economic recovery in sight, there are already signs that homelessness is returning to British streets. In London, rough sleeping, the most visible form of homelessness, rose by 8% last year. Strikingly, more than half of the capital's 3,600 rough sleepers are now not British citizens: most are migrants from eastern Europe who cannot find work and, unable to get benefits or return home, are left to fend for themselves on the streets.

The charity says the evidence is that the current recession has seen the poor suffer the most, but other parts of society may be in jeopardy if the government's radical welfare agenda is acted on as the economy stutters.

"Any significant reduction of the welfare safety net in the UK as a result of coalition reforms may, of course, bring the scenario of middle-class homelessness that much closer," the report states.

The charity says that the government needs to reverse cuts to housing benefit and invest urgently in new housing. It also calls on ministers to withdraw the most radical provisions in the localism bill, which would make "temporary accommodation" for needy families just that. Under the new legislation, councils would be forced to remove parents and children who have been in a hotel for a year. At present the assistance is open-ended.

There is also an alarming trend in what the charity calls the "hidden homeless" ? families forced to squeeze into one room rather than a flat. It says 630,000 households are now "overcrowded", with London and the south-east the worst hit. This trend could worsen: this summer a survey by the National Landlords Association found more than half of private landlords were planning to reduce the number of properties they let to tenants on housing benefits. Crisis says more families will be forced to share an ever decreasing number of homes.

In a separate report, Channel 4 News will broadcast further evidence that official figures underestimate the true picture of homelessness. In Crawley, West Sussex, the Open House hostel said it turned away people needing a bed almost 2,000 times last year, although official figures estimate there are just seven homeless people in the town. Two-thirds of homelessness organisations nationwide told Channel 4 there had been a rise in rough sleeping in their area.

Leslie Morphy, Crisis's chief executive, said: "We are extremely worried. Homelessness in both its visible and hidden forms is already rising and as the economic downturn causes further increases in unemployment and pressure on households' finances, homelessness is likely to continue to rise. This research is clear that it is the welfare and housing systems in the UK that traditionally have broken the link between unemployment and poverty and homelessness, yet these are now being radically dismantled by the coalition government. The government must listen and change course before this flow of homeless people becomes a flood."

Crisis argues that instead of doubling its efforts to end the "scandal" of homelessness, the government is in effect making it impossible for those on low incomes to pay their rent. It says in the past British welfare policy, unlike that in the US, has linked housing benefit to actual rents. But the government's changes break this link and mean that claimants will be priced out of swaths of the country ? or end up on the streets in wealthy regions.

The report also says the government's "affordable" house-building regime is likely to generate fewer than 50,000 homes by 2015, "well short of the 80,000 required to meet ministers' targets". Gone will be the lifetime tenancies offered by councils which had to give priority to those in need. Instead, under new powers, local authorities will be able to choose families with "local connections".

With the coalition's welfare reform bill heading to the Lords and MPs voting on the localism bill next week, Labour said Crisis's warnings were a "timely reminder of a looming homeless catastrophe". Karen Buck, Labour's welfare spokesperson, said the government had played down the rising number of people who thanks to the economic downturn were forced to rely on housing benefit.

She said that since the government took power another 150,000 families had been forced on to housing benefit. "The numbers relying on housing benefit to help with housing costs have been soaring. These figures include not just the unemployed but hundreds of thousands of working families. Rising rents, benefit cuts and housing shortages risk a homeless catastrophe will with all the associated human and financial costs."

The Department for Communities and Local Government said: "Ministers have always made clear their commitment to ensure the most vulnerable in society are protected, which is why the government is investing �400m in preventing homelessness, and has announced plans to extend the London project, No Second Night Out, across the country so no one spends more than one night sleeping rough.

"But the most important thing the government can do to help struggling households to stay in their homes is to keep interest rates low, and to do that we must cut the deficit. That is why we are introducing reforms that will cut the housing benefit bill. But to ensure a smooth transition to this new system, the government is giving councils a �190m fund to help those families most in need.

"Far from the claims made by Crisis, the government's �4.5bn affordable homes programme is set to exceed expectations and deliver up to 170,000 affordable homes by 2015."


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/aug/30/homelessness-middle-class-crisis-study

Bill Richardson Mitt Romney Karl Rove Rick Santorum Arnold Schwarzenegger