(CNN) -- Less than a week after New York became the nation's sixth state to legalize same-sex marriage, Rhode Island lawmakers are poised to vote on a bill that would permit civil unions between gay and lesbian couples.
The bill is widely seen as compromise meant to provide same-same couples with legal rights and benefits afforded to married couples, while also preventing an expanded definition of marriage.
Rhode Island's Senate Judiciary Committee approved the measure late Wednesday afternoon by a vote of 7-4, sending it to the Democrat-controlled Senate floor where lawmakers are expected to approve the bill, according to the state Senate's spokesman, Greg Pare.
The legislation, which passed overwhelmingly in the state's lower house on May 19, would afford same-sex couples a host of state tax breaks, healthcare benefits and foster a greater ease of inheritance.
Gov. Lincoln Chaffe, an independent, is expected to sign the bill into law should it pass the Democrat-controlled Senate, according to his spokesman, Michael Trainor.
But the controversial measure also drew sharp criticism from religious leaders and other opposition groups who say it would lead to court-ordered action that would eventually legalize same-sex marriage.
Similar legal action in Connecticut and Massachusetts resulted in those states adopting same-sex marriage laws, noted Christopher Plante, executive director of the National Organization for Marriage's Rhode Island chapter.
Chaffe -- who is supportive of potential legislation that legalizes same-sex marriage -- says civil unions are "a step in the right direction," according to Trainor.
Meanwhile, gay rights activists -- like Marriage Equality Rhode Island -- say that while they support the civil union bill, they would prefer legislation that permits same-sex couples to wed.
The group has also urged Chaffe not to sign the measure if it includes a controversial House amendment that permits groups with religious affiliations to refuse certain legal rights afforded to civil unions.
For instance, a hospital with a religious affiliation could refuse a civil union partner from being involved in the emergency medical care decisions of their spouse if it chose to do so, said Ray Sullivan, a spokesman for the activist group.
Chaffe is "very aware of the concerns that have been expressed," Trainor said, but will likely sign the bill into law should it pass the Senate.
House spokesman Larry Berman called the amendment a "red herring," pursued by the state's more radical activists.
The exemption, he said, is meant to provide religious protections against potential litigation.
"It's a small exception," Berman said, when compared to the slew of new rights and benefits same-sex couples would enjoy should the measure pass.
Civil unions are currently permitted in New Jersey and Illinois, and will be allowed in Delaware and Hawaii beginning January 1, 2012.
Three West Coast states -- California, Oregon and Washington -- plus Nevada, also allow for "comprehensive domestic partnerships" between same-sex couples, largely considered an equivalent to their civil union counterparts.
Rhode Island and Maine are the only states in New England that do not permit same-sex marriage. Iowa, New York and the District of Columbia also allow gay and lesbian couples to wed.
Last week, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo a signed a bill that legalizes same-sex marriage, more than doubling the number of Americans living in states that permit such unions.
The measure will take effect on July 24, providing gay and lesbian couples with new rights that include employer health benefits, easier inheritance and a host of state tax breaks.
Federal recognition, however, was not a part of Friday's vote, leaving benefits like Social Security and ease of immigration largely out of reach for same-sex couples.
The controversial bill passed New York's Republican-controlled Senate before reaching Cuomo's desk, in an extended legislative session that left many skeptical over whether lawmakers would bring the measure to a vote.
Source: http://rss.cnn.com/~r/rss/cnn_allpolitics/~3/baR3cps70G4/index.html
Dennis Hastert Vaclav Havel John Howard Mike Huckabee Saddam Hussein
No comments:
Post a Comment