Tuesday, September 20, 2011

So Far, Obama's Been No Friend to Israel

Ed Koch, New York Daily News
When Gov. Cuomo announced there would be a special election in the 9th Congressional District to replace Anthony Weiner, I gave public voice to an idea that had been percolating in my head for some time. As everyone now knows, I wound up strongly supporting the candidacy of Bob Turner, who last week won the seat in a hotly contested race.I want to explain why I did what I did, so there's no misunderstanding of my intentions, or of my future plans. I hope President Obama gets the message that's been sent. If he does -- and if he announces, for example, that an attack by Turkey (which...

Source: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2011/09/19/so_far_obama039s_been_no_friend_to_israel_263755.html

Ron Paul Colin Powell Vladimir Putin Muammar Qaddafi Condoleezza Rice

Disperse Gurkhas like asylum seekers, urges minister

But his comments have sparked anger among those who argue that Britain owes the veterans a debt of gratitude after years of loyal service in the army.

Peter Carroll of the Gurkha Justice Campaign said: ?This was entirely disrespectful. They are just as much constituents as white middle-class people who have lived there 30-years.

?His words have caused an enormous amount of fear among the community who are now concerned they are going to be uprooted and moved elsewhere.?

In 2009 a campaign spearheaded by actress Joanna Lumley, whose father was a Gurkha commander, succeeded in persuading the government to grant soldiers with four or more years of service the right to settle in the UK with their loved ones.



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement | WordPress Tutorials

Source: http://telegraph.feedsportal.com/c/32726/f/568387/s/1899cecd/l/0L0Stelegraph0O0Cnews0C87756870CDisperse0EGurkhas0Elike0Easylum0Eseekers0Eurges0Eminister0Bhtml/story01.htm

Al Gore Chuck Hagel Stephen Harper Dennis Hastert Vaclav Havel

Liberal Democrat conference 2011: live coverage

Rolling coverage of all the day's developments in Birmingham

8.27am: Nick Clegg's interview is now over. He's done various other interviews this morning too. I'll post a summary of the highlights shortly.

8.22am: The interview is still going on.

Q: What is the Lib Dem policy on the euro?

Clegg says the government is not going to join the euro this parliament.

Q: Does that mean the prospect of Britain joining is over for a generation?

Clegg says it is difficult to predict the future. He says he does not expect it to happen in his lifetime. Then he corrects himself, and says he does not expect Britain to join in his political lifetime, while he is Lib Dem leader.

He also says that no one predicted that the countries that signed up to the euro would be allowed to break the rules in the way that he did.

8.17am: The interview is still going on.

Q: What is your evidence that the bond markets would punish the UK if the government changed its economic plans?

Clegg says when the government came to powers, other countries had lower deficits. But they are being penalised because they are not tackling their deficits.

Q: But it looks as if Italy is being punished by the markets because of lack of growth, which is the problem here. And UK debt has to be paid back over a longer period of time?

Clegg says the government has pulled the economy back from the brink, creating the space where it can do more to promote growth.

Q: But Italy is being punished because it has not got enough growth. We've got the same problem.

Italy has other problems, Clegg says. It has an ageing population.

Q: Aren't you conceding then that the UK is not in the same position Italy?

Clegg says that saying Britain is not Italy is a statement of the obvious.

8.14am: Nick Clegg is on the Today programme now. Justin Webb is interviewing him.

Q: You said the government would not approve of "gratuitously offensive" bank bonuses. Aren't the current bonuses paid to bankers gratuitously offensive?

Clegg says he would like to have gone further. But in the Project Merlin agreement, the banks have committed themselves to bringing bonuses down.

Q: But it's not happening very quickly?

Clegg says it is not happening as quickly as he would like. But the government is introducing the greatest move towards transparency in this area the country has seen.

And Vince Cable has said shareholders should have more power in this area, Clegg says. Corporate governance is going to change, even though perhaps not as quickly as people would wish.

Q: But the cuts are taking place now. Why do you need to consult on these changes?

Clegg says in most areas of government people consult.

Q: When will the Vickers recommendations be implemented?

Clegg says everyone in government would like to do it as quickly as possible. But it is important to get it right. Vickers has set 2019 as a deadline. But that's a "backstop date", Clegg says. It might be possible to implement the changes ringfencing the retails arms of banks before then.

8.08am: Nick Clegg is about to give an interview to the Today programme. I'll cover it here, before taking a look at some of the other broadcast interviews he's been giving today. As for the rest of the day, here's what's coming up.

9am: The conference opens. Delegates debate party rule changes affecting emergency motions and appeals.

9.40am: Delegates debate a motion calling for rules stopping men who have had sex with men (MSM) from giving blood to be reformed.

10.20am: A debate on social care. Delegates debate a call for the establishment of an older people's commissioner.

11.15am: Steve Webb, the pensions minister, delivers his speech to the conference.

11.35am: Paul Burstow, the health minister, John Pugh, the co-chair of the Lib Dem parliamentary health committee and Shirley Williams, the Lib Dem grandee and health bill "rebel", take part in a question and answer session on health.

12.20pm: Chris Huhne, the energy secretary, deliver his speech to the conference.

2.30pm: Delegates debate a motion on green policies saying the legislation to set up a Green Investment Bank should be introduced next year.

3.30pm: Andrew Stunell, the communities minister, delivers his speech to the conference.

3.50pm: Delegates debate a motion calling for the establishment of a national institute of wellbeing.

5.20pm: Delegates debate motion urging the Lib Dems to make a renewed commitment to the principles of "community politics".

As usual, I'll be covering all the Lib Dem conference news, as well as looking at the papers and the best politics on the web. I'll post a lunchtime summary at around 1pm and an afternoon one at about 6pm. After that my colleague Paul Owen will take over the blog and keep it going into the evening.


guardian.co.uk © 2011 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/blog/2011/sep/20/liberal-democrat-conference-2011-live

Tea Party Joe Biden John Boehner Sarah Palin Sean Hannity

Dale Farm Travellers win injunction delaying eviction

Celebrations after high court grants emergency order restraining Basildon council from clearing site

Residents due to be evicted from the Dale Farm Traveller site won an 11th-hour reprieve on Monday after being granted an emergency injunction restraining Basildon council from clearing structures on the site pending a further hearing at the high court on Friday.

There were cheers from the barricade shortly after 5pm when the news arrived that bailiffs, who were due to begin evicting 86 families from the site built on a former scrapyard, would not be able to enter legally until after the hearing.

The council will also not be able to cut off utilities to the site, something that had concerned residents, who argued that the lives of sick people on the site could be endangered.

Speaking at the high court in London, Mr Justice Edwards-Stuart granted the order because there were concerns that measures carried out by Basildon borough council "may go further" than the terms of the enforcement notices.

The case hinges on the argument that residents have not been sufficiently informed about what is allowed on each pitch and what must be removed.

Despite the scale of the operation by Basildon council, which includes a camp to accommodate bailiffs, police, council staff and the hundreds of journalists from around the world covering the case, it took three individuals, without the aid of a lawyer, to put a stop to their plans.

Candy Sheridan, vice-chair of the Gypsy Council of North Norfolk, resident Mary Sheridan and volunteer Stuart Carruthers appeared at three courts on Monday, including the high court, before the injunction was granted.

Speaking after the decision, Sheridan said: "This is a victory for residents who have been shown a glimmer of respect today from a judge who listened to our reasoned arguments."

The leader of the council, Tony Ball, said he was "extremely disappointed and frustrated" by the judge's decision.

"I am absolutely clear that on this issue, on Friday, the court will find in the council's favour and that the site clearance will be able to continue," he said.

"But until then, as always, this council will comply with the law and we will comply with the judgment that has been put before us."

The judge ruled that Basildon council must tell residents on a plot-by-plot basis what enforcement measures are proposed. Residents must respond to the proposals by noon on Thursday. The judge will then decide at 11.30am on Friday if there are any remaining legal issues that could extend the injunction further.

Physical structures including cars and caravans will not be able to be moved by bailiffs and electricity and water will not be cut off unless they pose a danger "to life and limb".

But the judge said further protest ? which has included several protesters chained to the gates, to concrete blocks and to each other ? should be discouraged and that the 20ft (6m) high barricade, festooned with banners of support, should be taken down.

"It is in nobody's interests that we have a riot on this site," he said. "There's got to be a bit of give and take over a limited timeframe to see if the problems can be dealt with in an orderly rather than disruptive way."

Council representatives should be allowed on site to discuss the arrangements with individual residents, he said.

He told the Dale Farm representatives: "I appreciate it is a deeply unpleasant situation but unfortunately this is a road which is reaching its end and there is sadly no mileage in prolonging the agony."

Some protesters were not in favour of bringing down the barricade. "I think it's tactical on their side and therefore it needs to be tactical on ours," said Carol Stuart McIvor, a writer on the site. "But the decision must be the Travellers'. It's their gig ? we are only here to support them."

The council's barrister, Reuben Taylor, told the judge a lengthy delay to the eviction could cause losses to the public purse "running into millions", he said.

Any damages granted would not come "anywhere near" meeting the council's costs for the thousands of police officers on special duty, compounds, plant hire and bailiffs, he said. "The consequences would be enormous."

The judge responded that there was "a lack of clarity" as to which properties would be affected and to what extent.

He said: "They are entitled to know whether their home is on the list for permanent removal or not, or whether just a little bit of their plot is to be removed."

There was delight at Dale Farm as the news came through after a tense day that saw bailiffs jeered as they issued a final warning to protesters and residents.

Bailiffs were called "scum" and "fascists" as they told residents the council was concerned for their safety as a result of the blocking of the site gate.

Tom Berry, a resident at the site, said the injunction was a stay of execution and a relief for families.

"I'm over the moon. Especially for my family and the other residents on here. At the end of the day, we've got another week for them to sort something out for us or somewhere to go to."

He had a personal message for the leader of the council who had, earlier in the day, insisted that delaying tactics from residents were unacceptable. "Tony Ball should go back to school," he said.

Meanwhile, it has emerged that the government refused help from the United Nations to help broker an agreement between the Travellers and the council.

Jan Jarab, the European representative of the UN high commissioner for human rights, said the UN had offered to help negotiate a "less dramatic" solution.

"There was communication between the British government and our headquarters, but it was made clear to us that we would receive a letter that that offer was rejected," he said.


guardian.co.uk © 2011 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/sep/19/dale-farm-travellers-win-injunction

Tea Party Joe Biden John Boehner Sarah Palin Sean Hannity

Monday, September 19, 2011

Obama Leans Further Left

Michael Goodwin, New York Post
One of the enduring mysteries of the Obama presidency is why he keeps leaning far left when independent voters make it clear they want a centrist in the White House. It is not an academic point -- independents swung the 2008 election his way, and without them, Obama probably can’t win a second term.Well, consider the mystery solved. The reason Obama keeps tilting left is that so many independents have dumped him and he has almost no chance of getting them back. So energizing libs for a massive turnout is his next-best hope.

Source: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2011/09/19/obama_leans_further_left_263765.html

Rudy Giuliani Jimmy Carter Dick Cheney Barack Obama George Soros

Tony Blair advising David Cameron on Middle East

Mr Blair has a country home in Buckinghamshire not far from Chequers.

William Hague, the Foreign Secretary, has said he speaks to Mr Blair regularly.

It is understood that Mr Hague and Mr Blair spoke this week about the UN process.

They are understood to have met in New York yesterday at the request of Mr Cameron.

The United States is threatening to veto Palestine's application for statehood and Germany and the Netherlands oppose it.

Spain, France and Sweden, however, are in favour.

Mr Blair said yesterday: ?The Palestinians are perfectly entitled to take their case to the UN, perfectly entitled to have the UN hear it.

"The real point, however, is whatever happens at the UN, we are in a better place to get a Palestinian state if we also have a revived negotiation.?

One of the main stumbling blocks to peace is that Israeli settlers continue to build on land which the Palestinians claim as their own.

Mr Cameron's choice of guests at Chequers has been scrutinised before.

Earlier this year, it was disclosed that Andy Coulson visited the Buckinghamshire house in March.

The former editor of the News of the World had resigned from his post as the Prime Minister's head of communications two months earlier.

Chequers has been the official country residence of the British prime minister since it was handed to the nation in 1921 under the terms of the Chequers Estate Act 1917.



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement | WordPress Tutorials

Source: http://telegraph.feedsportal.com/c/32726/f/568387/s/1897ce95/l/0L0Stelegraph0O0Cnews0Cpolitics0Cdavid0Ecameron0C87755490CTony0EBlair0Eadvising0EDavid0ECameron0Eon0EMiddle0EEast0Bhtml/story01.htm

Gloria Arroyo Joe Biden Abdullah bin Abdulaziz al-Saud King Abdulla Osama bin Laden

Obama arrives at UN as pressure grows on Palestinians over statehood bid

Diplomatic quartet meets to try to kickstart negotiations, as France admits showdown with US will damage Palestinian cause

Barack Obama arrived at the United Nations on Monday evening as pressure intensified on the Palestinian leadership to abandon its plan to ask the UN security council to declare the occupied territories a Palestinian state.

The Europeans are at the forefront of attempts to persuade the Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas, to back off from the request.

Even France, which is generally sympathetic to the call for statehood, is now saying that the diplomatic cost of a showdown with the US, which has said it will veto the move in the security council, will damage the Palestinian cause.

Abbas said "all hell has broken out against us" over the bid for statehood but he told the UN secretary general, Ban Ki-moon, that he would not be diverted from his plan to make the request to the security council on Friday.

The Middle East quartet of the EU, UN, US and Russia were to meet on Monday evening in an attempt to construct a formula to restart peace talks and stave off a showdown in the security council. Diplomats say the key is to make the proposal strong enough, in part by stating clearly that negotiations will be on the basis of 1967 borders with some swaps of territories, so that Abbas can claim a significant step toward ending the occupation. But the Palestinians remain deeply sceptical after 20 years of negotiations failing to win their independence.

The French foreign minister, Alain Juppe, said in New York that he planned to tell Abbas at a meeting later on Monday that going to the security council will be a political error.

"I will ask him: what is his strategy? Going to the security council, and what after that?" he said. "We have to avoid such a confrontation. We have to find a balanced solution."

Juppe said that the "relaunch of the peace process is needed" and that the international community has "three or four days" to find a solution.

But Juppe also warned that the status quo of the Israeli occupation is "neither acceptable nor tenable", and that lack of progress toward a solution will lead to another "explosion of violence".

The British foreign secretary, William Hague, said in New York that the Palestinian move is "not a course of action that we recommend, because it will just lead to confrontation".

"The best outcome of all the negotiations and discussions taking place here in New York this week would be if Palestinians and Israelis agreed to go back into negotiations together," he said, a position echoed by the US secretary of state, Hillary Clinton.

The Israeli prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, who flies to New York on Tuesday, said Abbas was "wasting time" with the bid for statehood, and called on him instead to meet for face-to-face talks in New York.

"I call on the PA chair to open direct negotiations in New York that will continue in Jerusalem and Ramallah," Netanyahu said.

Diplomats said that the principal American strategy now appears to be to pressure enough non-permanent members of the security council to vote against Palestinian statehood or, more likely, abstain in the hope of denying Abbas the nine votes he needs to win and so save the US the embarrassment of having to wield its veto.

Neither Britain nor France has said how they will vote in the security council if the issue comes before them. Both are permanent members and a no vote would count as a veto.

However, there is the possibility the Palestinians could also take the matter to the general assembly. It has the power only to offer only observer status but a vote in favour would be a moral victory. Hague did not rule out British support for that move.

"We, along with all the other 26 countries of the European Union, have withheld our position on how we would vote on any resolution that may come forward in the general assembly in order to exert as much pressure on both sides to return to negotiations," he said.

Diplomats said a number of possilibitlies have been under discussion, including that Abbas might submit his request to the security council and that it will be put on hold while fresh peace talks begin. If they fail, or if agreement is not reached by a specified deadline, the request would then be revived and brought before the security council.

But backtracking now will prove difficult for Abbas, after a he made a resolute speech late last week saying that the Palestinians have been forced in to the move by Israeli intransigence, and that he would not be "bought off".

The Palestinian leadership is also deeply sceptical of American claims to be prepared to act as an honest broker in fresh talks. It has lost confidence in Obama's claims to be prepared to stand up to Israel.

"It's going to be a close-run thing," said one western diplomat at the UN. "Can Abbas be persuaded that it's not in the Palestinians' interests to have a confrontation with the Americans in the security council and to embarrass Obama? I doubt it, but it might happen. If not, can the Americans get the votes together in the security council to avoid the veto?

"I defy anyone to predict how this is going to turn out by the end of the week."


guardian.co.uk © 2011 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/sep/20/obama-un-palestinian-statehood-bid

Osama bin Laden Tony Blair Sam Brownback Laura Bush George W. Bush

President Must Maintain Strong Stand

David Corn, Mother Jones
Ahead of President Barack Obama's big speech on Monday morning outlining his "growth and deficit reduction plan," the White House released a fact sheet detailing his proposal to cut an additional $3 trillion from the deficit in the next ten years. It noted that the plan includes Obama's American Jobs Act and will lead to a total of $4.4 trillion in deficit reduction. Over $300 billion would be squeezed out of Medicare and Medicaid, with about two-thirds of that resulting from reducing "overpayments" in Medicare.The plan does not include any cuts in benefits for...

Source: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2011/09/19/president_must_maintain_strong_stand_263785.html

King Abdulla Osama bin Laden Tony Blair Sam Brownback Laura Bush

Get Real: Bush, GOP to Blame for Obama Woes

Bill Keller, New York Times
Just a few winters ago my wife and I took our daughters to witness the inauguration of a man who had campaigned on hope and embodied possibility. We are pretty immune to political euphoria, but, circulating among the footsore pilgrims, we could imagine our country had embraced the idea that we were all in this together. When the newly sworn-in president congratulated us all on choosing unity of purpose over recriminations and worn-out dogmas, we wanted to believe that we had done exactly that.Inaugurations, of course, are ceremonial ephemera. After the "Ask not" comes the...

Source: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2011/09/19/get_real_bush_gop_to_blame_for_obama_woes_263746.html

George Bush George W. Bush Hillary Clinton Bill Clinton Rudy Giuliani

Obama Insists on Taxes Hikes in Deficit Plan

abc barack obama dm 110919 wblog Obama Outlines Deficit Reduction Plan: This Is Not Class Warfare

������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� ABC News

President Obama today outlined a revamped plan to reduce the nation?s debt by more than $2 trillion in new tax increases and entitlement reforms, asking ?everybody to do their part so that nobody has to bear too much of the burden on their own.?

The plan, however, will likely be deemed dead-on-arrival by Republicans, who have vowed to reject tax increases as part of any plan to bring down the deficit.

?We can?t just cut our way out of this hole.� It?s going to take a balanced approach,? Obama said in the Rose Garden today. ?If we?re going to make spending cuts ? then it?s only right that we ask everyone to pay their fair share.?

The bulk of the savings in the president?s plan come from $1.5 trillion in deficit-reduction through new taxes for high-end earners and $580 billion in cuts to entitlement programs, including $248 billion to Medicare and $72 billion to Medicaid.

The White House is seeking to draw stark contrasts with Republicans and force them to align with corporations and the wealthy. The president made clear today that he will veto any plan that seeks to cut the deficit through spending cuts alone and does not include tax increases as well.

?I am ready, I am eager to work with Democrats and Republicans to reform the tax code to make it simpler, to make it fairer and make America more competitive,? Obama said.�?But any reform plan will have to raise revenue to help close our deficit.� That has to be part of the formula.?

The move puts the White House at odds with Republicans who have already spoken out against the president?s plan to raise taxes, calling it ?class warfare,? a notion the president sternly rejected today.

Republicans have specifically taken issue with the president?s ?Buffet Rule? proposal. Named for the billionaire investor Warren Buffett, the rule would require those making more than $1 million a year to pay the same tax rate as middle-class families.

?Middle- class families shouldn?t pay higher taxes than millionaires and billionaires,? Obama said.�?That?s pretty straightforward.�It?s hard to argue against that.�Warren Buffett?s secretary shouldn?t pay a higher tax rate than Warren Buffett.� There?s no justification for it.?

Republicans reject that argument. ?Class warfare will simply divide this country more. It will attack job creators, divide people and it doesn?t grow the economy,? Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., said on FOX News Sunday. ?Class warfare may make for really good politics, but it makes for rotten economics.?

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., agreed, mocking the Buffet argument in an interview on NBC?s ?Meet the Press.

?If he?s feeling guilty about it, I think he should send in a check. ? But we don?t want to stagnate this economy by raising taxes,? he said.

The president today said this kind of thinking was ?unacceptable? to the American people. ?This is not class warfare.� It?s math,? he said. ?The money is going to have to come from someplace.?

Obama�also proposed other means to raise taxes, including more than $800 billion by allowing the Bush tax cuts for upper income earners to expire and $300 billion by closing loopholes and eliminating special-interest tax breaks.

In total, the president?s plan will claim more than $4 trillion in deficit reduction through entitlement cuts, tax increases and war savings, in particular. The proposal includes $1.2 trillion in savings from the Budget Control Act and $1.1 trillion from drawing down the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement | WordPress Tutorials

Source: http://feeds.abcnews.com/click.phdo?i=637966621da6bbb2f277edd9f44543a5

Condoleezza Rice Bill Richardson Mitt Romney Karl Rove Rick Santorum

�12bn 'black hole' in public finances could mean austerity for years to come

Analysts describe as credible a claim that the country's structural deficit is 25% bigger than previously thought

Britain could face many more years of austerity to balance the country's books, City economists warned, after a potential �12bn black hole was found in the public finances.

A calculation in the Financial Times says the structural deficit ? the deficit that persists even if the economy is growing at its full potential ? is 25% bigger than previously thought, leaving chancellor George Osborne with a �12bn gap. Plugging it would require new austerity measures equivalent to raising VAT to 22.5%.

Analysts described the claim as credible because the calculation was based on the Office for Budget Responsibility's own methodology.

Carl Emmerson, deputy director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, a respected think tank, said: "It's getting more likely that we are going to have to see more pain in the next parliament ? the squeeze in spending will go on or tax rises. The chances of a pre-election give-away look less likely. Austerity is getting more likely to continue into the next parliament."

However, Barclays Capital analyst Chris Crowe said that even with such a shortfall, the government would still just meet its target of eliminating the structural deficit by 2015/16. It is forecast to hit almost �50bn this year.

"But the margin is so tight, any additional changes in assumptions could tip it over the edge. It's touch and go," Crowe said. He has long argued that the government will struggle to hit its fiscal targets, saying the OBR's estimates for economic growth are too optimistic.

But Crowe said: "Any further austerity measures would be undertaken with reluctance if there is a general deterioration in the economy. It seems clear that the [existing] austerity measures have contributed to the general poor state of confidence, both business and consumer confidence, and so additional measures would only make it worse at this stage.

"On the other hand, the government has set great store by its pledge to meet its targets."

He thinks that "fairly minor measures" to keep the public finances on track might be unveiled by the chancellor in his autumn statement on 29 November, should the OBR's latest projections indicate that his borrowing plans are slipping. A Treasury spokesman declined to comment, noting that the official forecast is produced by the independent OBR, which will update its forecasts in November.

Philip Shaw, chief economist at Investec, said: "I'm not convinced that hitting the economy with further tax increases or spending cuts is the appropriate course of action. Could we see a 2.5% hike in VAT? I very much doubt it.

"I would very much question George Osborne's appetite for further fiscal tightening, let alone the Liberal Democrats'."

One issue is whether the economy has less spare capacity ? ie room to grow sustainably ? than previously thought, as Charlie Bean, deputy governor of the Bank of England, conceded last month. "We have a high degree of uncertainty about what the spare capacity in the economy is, but our assessment is that... the recession has led to a relatively long-lasting hit on... spare capacity."

If there is less spare capacity in the economy than previously thought, a bigger portion of the government deficit will be permanent, rather than being wiped out once the economy bounces back.

As the OBR's chairman, Robert Chote, explained in March: "The amount of spare capacity you have determines how far the economy can grow in a sustainable way and, therefore, how much of the deficit that we have at the moment will be soaked up naturally as the economy recovers and how much, as it were is left for policy to deal with." He admitted that the biggest uncertainty in the OBR's forecasts was whether it had correctly estimated the amount of spare capacity.


guardian.co.uk © 2011 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/sep/19/economy-austerity-black-hole-osborne

Sam Brownback Laura Bush George W. Bush George H. W. Bush Jimmy Carter

Liberal Democrats Party Conference 2011: We're fighting an economic war, says Vince Cable

He added: ?When my staff saw my draft of this speech they said, 'we can see the grey skies, where are the sunny uplands?? I am sorry, I can only tell it as I see it.

?People aren?t thinking about 10 years ahead when they are worrying about how to survive the next 10 days to pay day. The truth is that there are difficult times ahead.?

His comments were far more stark than those made by Treasury ministers who have stressed that plans to cut the deficit have left the country in a good position.

George Osborne, the Chancellor, has insisted that Britain is a ?safe haven? but Downing Street advisers are urgently making new economic plans.

Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister, who will address the conference tomorrow, said the Government was bringing forward billions of pounds of spending on infrastructure such as energy plants, roads and railways.



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement | WordPress Tutorials

Source: http://telegraph.feedsportal.com/c/32726/f/568387/s/18972380/l/0L0Stelegraph0O0Cnews0Cpolitics0Cliberaldemocrats0C87753930CLiberal0EDemocrats0EParty0EConference0E20A110EWere0Efighting0Ean0Eeconomic0Ewar0Esays0EVince0ECable0Bhtml/story01.htm

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad Omar al-Bashir Gloria Arroyo Joe Biden Abdullah bin Abdulaziz al-Saud

A Little Inflation Can Be a Dangerous Thing

Paul Volcker, NY Times
IN all the commentary about Ben S. Bernanke’s recent speech in Jackson Hole, Wyo., little attention has been paid to six crucial words: “in a context of price stability.” Those words concluded a discussion by Mr. Bernanke, the Federal Reserve chairman, of what tools the central bank could consider appropriate to promote a stronger economic recovery.Ordinarily, a central banker’s affirming the importance of price stability is not headline news. But consider the setting. There is great and understandable disappointment about high unemployment and the...

Source: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2011/09/19/a_little_inflation_can_be_a_dangerous_thing_263745.html

Ted Kennedy John Kerry Ban Ki-moon Henry Kissinger Dennis Kucinich

Lib Dems need to move on from 'really tough year', says Nick Clegg

Deputy prime minister admitted failure to communicate core messages but said conscience was clear about the big decisions

Nick Clegg issued an impassioned plea to his fellow Liberal Democrats on Monday to stop "beating ourselves up" over the compromises the party had to make in forming a coalition with the Tories.

In a pep talk at the Lib Dem conference, the deputy prime minister admitted that he had failed to communicate many of his core messages during a "really tough year", though he insisted the party had made the right judgment call overall.

Clegg, whose comments came during a 45-minute question and answer session, said: "We have had a really, really tough year, a really tough year, the like of which I think many of us could not have predicted. But we have got to stop beating ourselves up about it. A political party that does not move forward always ends up going backwards."

The deputy prime minister said that the party had a clear conscience after forming a coalition in the national interest. "I remember looking in the rear view mirror at all the people ranting, saying, why did you do this? The supporters we lost. But at the end of the day, when you explained to them calmly over and over again why we did what we did and that our conscience is clear on the big judgments ? not on individual decisions ? we have nothing to apologise for."

The remarks by Clegg, who appeared impatient at times, encapsulated his core message at this year's conference in Birmingham. First, the Lib Dems had a duty to form a coalition, after the electorate declined to hand any party a majority, and to show this could work by working in a civilised manner with the Tories. Second, Lib Dems now had the space to trumpet their own achievements after showing the coalition is stable.

Clegg reeled off a list of policies that would not have been introduced if the Tories had governed alone:

? Taking 1 million people on low pay out of paying income tax.

? Making every basic rate taxpayer �200 better off because of the increase in the income tax threshold.

? Restoring the earnings link for pensioners.

The deputy prime minister illustrated the Lib Dem influence in government by announcing a new �350m programme to help educate an extra 1 million girls in Africa and Asia. "That is us bringing our convictions to bear," he said.

Announcing the policy, Clegg said: "The evidence is now overwhelming. If you want to deal with the demographics in the developing world, if you want to deal with levels of economic development, educational performance ? start with women, start with girls." Illustrating how the Lib Dems will now hail their achievements, Clegg said: "You have got to constantly, constantly, constantly tell our side of the story. If we don't tell our side of the story, I tell you, very many other people won't."

But he said people had to understand that both parties had to compromise because neither won the election. "It is a coalition. It is built on compromise. People either accept that compromise can work. It is not a dirty word. You've got people on the left who hate it, who scream at us 'treachery'. People from the right, like Nadine Dorries, cannot get over the fact that the Conservatives didn't win the last election."

He lit up when a delegate highlighted research showing that the Lib Dems had managed to include 75% of their manifesto in the coalition agreement, compared with 60% for the Tories. "I have always been taught by my mum to be modest about your achievements. But the fact that the BBC should choose to publish research showing that 75% of our manifesto is being delivered in the coalition agreement ? more than even the Conservatives ? exposes the lie that somehow we have sold ourselves short."

But Clegg said the leadership was guilty of a failure of communication over policies such as university tuition fees. He said the coalition's policy, which will see a trebling of fees, is fairer because the repayment threshold has been lifted from �15,000 to �21,000.

"I totally accept the challenge, self-evidently, that have we been really successful in communicating all that? No, clearly not. Do we need to? You bet," he said. "Are we getting better at doing that? Yes, we are. Have we got a long way to go? Even more so, yes. If you look at what ministers are doing, day in day out, and what we did when we negotiated the coalition agreement, I don't think any fair-minded person looking in the round can say we did anything other than punch above our weight."


guardian.co.uk © 2011 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2011/sep/19/lib-dems-tough-year-nick-clegg

Rick Santorum Arnold Schwarzenegger Rev. Al Sharpton Than Shwe Aung San Suu Kyi

Obama Insists on Taxes Hikes in Deficit Plan

abc barack obama dm 110919 wblog Obama Outlines Deficit Reduction Plan: This Is Not Class Warfare

������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� ABC News

President Obama today outlined a revamped plan to reduce the nation?s debt by more than $2 trillion in new tax increases and entitlement reforms, asking ?everybody to do their part so that nobody has to bear too much of the burden on their own.?

The plan, however, will likely be deemed dead-on-arrival by Republicans, who have vowed to reject tax increases as part of any plan to bring down the deficit.

?We can?t just cut our way out of this hole.� It?s going to take a balanced approach,? Obama said in the Rose Garden today. ?If we?re going to make spending cuts ? then it?s only right that we ask everyone to pay their fair share.?

The bulk of the savings in the president?s plan come from $1.5 trillion in deficit-reduction through new taxes for high-end earners and $580 billion in cuts to entitlement programs, including $248 billion to Medicare and $72 billion to Medicaid.

�The White House is seeking to draw stark contrasts with Republicans and force them to align with corporations and the wealthy. The president made clear today that he will veto any plan that seeks to cut the deficit through spending cuts alone and does not include tax increases as well.�

?I am ready, I am eager to work with Democrats and Republicans to reform the tax code to make it simpler, to make it fairer and make America more competitive,? Obama said.�?But any reform plan will have to raise revenue to help close our deficit.� That has to be part of the formula.?

The move puts the White House at odds with Republicans who have already spoken out against the president?s plan to raise taxes, calling it ?class warfare,? a notion the president sternly rejected today.

Republicans have specifically taken issue with the president?s ?Buffet Rule? proposal. Named for the billionaire investor Warren Buffett, the rule would require those making more than $1 million a year to pay the same tax rate as middle-class families.

?Middle- class families shouldn?t pay higher taxes than millionaires and billionaires,? Obama said.�?That?s pretty straightforward.�It?s hard to argue against that.�Warren Buffett?s secretary shouldn?t pay a higher tax rate than Warren Buffett.� There?s no justification for it.?

Republicans reject that argument. ?Class warfare will simply divide this country more. It will attack job creators, divide people and it doesn?t grow the economy,? Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., said on FOX News Sunday. ?Class warfare may make for really good politics, but it makes for rotten economics.?

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., agreed, mocking the Buffet argument in an interview on NBC?s ?Meet the Press.

?If he?s feeling guilty about it, I think he should send in a check. ? But we don?t want to stagnate this economy by raising taxes,? he said.

�The president today said this kind of thinking was ?unacceptable? to the American people. ?This is not class warfare.� It?s math,? he said. ?The money is going to have to come from someplace.?

Obama�also proposed other means to raise taxes, including more than $800 billion by allowing the Bush tax cuts for upper income earners to expire and $300 billion by closing loopholes and eliminating special-interest tax breaks.

In total, the president?s plan will claim more than $4 trillion in deficit reduction through entitlement cuts, tax increases and war savings, in particular. The proposal includes $1.2 trillion in savings from the Budget Control Act and $1.1 trillion from drawing down the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement | WordPress Tutorials

Source: http://feeds.abcnews.com/click.phdo?i=637966621da6bbb2f277edd9f44543a5

Tea Party Joe Biden John Boehner Sarah Palin Sean Hannity

Get Real: Bush, GOP to Blame for Obama's Woes

Bill Keller, NY Times
Just a few winters ago my wife and I took our daughters to witness the inauguration of a man who had campaigned on hope and embodied possibility. We are pretty immune to political euphoria, but, circulating among the footsore pilgrims, we could imagine our country had embraced the idea that we were all in this together. When the newly sworn-in president congratulated us all on choosing unity of purpose over recriminations and worn-out dogmas, we wanted to believe that we had done exactly that.Inaugurations, of course, are ceremonial ephemera. After the “Ask not” comes the...

Source: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2011/09/19/get_real_bush_gop_to_blame_for_obama039s_woes_263746.html

Evo Morales William Mountbatten-Windsor Prince William Charles Mountbatten-Windsor Prince Charles

The Great Schools Revolution

Source: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2011/09/19/the_great_schools_revolution_263771.html

John Edwards Dianne Feinstein Bill Frist Newt Gingrich Rudolph Giuliani

Dale Farm: two sides to every story | Michael White

I worry when the version of events at Dale Farm I hear on the BBC or read in the Guardian is so much at odds with the account I read in the Daily Mail and elsewhere

If you wish to comment on this issue, please go to our live blog

One of my liberal friends says: "Whenever I see Fergal Keane on the telly I turn down the sound." My friend has Irish ancestry, which I do not. But I know what he means. The BBC's Keane turned up at the Dale Farm Traveller camp the other day and has been providing regular frontline reports for radio and TV. I am astonished.

Why? Because I thought Fergal Keane had long since passed beyond mere reporting and gone on to higher service. His appearance anywhere gives an event status, much as Kate Adie's arrival at an airport used to indicate that bullets would soon be flying nearby.

Is the Dale Farm confrontation now underway between council/bailiffs and Travellers/anarchists worthy of such star status, of Fergal Keane's personal attention, not to mention that of the UN human rights chap who surfaced last week, worthy of leading this morning's radio bulletins long before the expected confrontation ? whoops, it later seemed to have been postponed ? had materialised? I'm not sure it is.

That's not to say the issues here are merely local or lack wider significance. In today's Guardian Alexandra Topping takes a good look at the marginalised and increasingly difficult lives lived by Travellers, Roma and their kin ? Irish Travellers are quite separate, the article suggests ? across Europe. Jan Jarab, a human rights official in Brussels, is quoted as suggesting that Gypsy Roma seem to do better in Britain than elsewhere, France and Italy for example.

I'm glad he makes that point. At the risk of further inflaming the Daily Mail I'd thought that too. Bad things have been happening in all sorts of places, economic pressures, the pressure to conform to a settled way of life, the desire of states and local administrations to tidy up groups which are, by their nature, untidy.

Travellers told Topping they feel more threatened and I'm sure they're right. Eric Pickles being in charge of the localism agenda must also make them nervous.

I'm for protecting the travelling way of life too, as best as can be achieved. It's like protecting minority languages ? we've had a real success with Welsh, less so with Scots Gaelic, I think ? or plants and animals. It's a form of biodiversity. Travelling hunter-gathering nomads were the norm in human society for thousands of years, very tough work too. Let's protect the volunteer remnants if we can.

The trouble is that there's usually two sides to any story, including this one. I worry when the version I hear on the BBC or sometimes read in the Guardian or Observer is so much at odds with the account I read in the Daily Mail and elsewhere.

In the latter version, the protracted battle (it's lasted 10 years) reflects the willingness of Traveller communities to defy the law, extend their camps illegally, fill local schools with unruly/itinerant kids and engage in antisocial, even criminal, activity.

On angry days ? today is not one of them ? the Mail version prints photos of houses owned by Dale Farm residents elsewhere in England or ? last week's tale ? in towns and villages in Ireland to which travelling folk return for an extended family knees-up at Christmas. In Fergal Keane's version his travelling fellow-countrymen are finally asserting their human rights in England, in the Mail's they're abusing other people's.

The tension between local residents who want their communities, schools and green belt sites protected from unwelcome and transient newcomers is a version of the "them and us" tensions which exist in all small communities ? and applies with as much vigour to retired admirals and City second homers who love-bomb picturesque villages all over southern England, especially those with a decent train service to London.

But this one is tougher for both sides and Essex county council ? which claims to be the most generous of southern English counties to Travellers, who like Essex in return ? seems to have tried quite hard to reconcile the conflicting claims at Dale Farm. I don't know for sure, I've not been there (I did offer to go), but that's what I read.

When talking to officials in Brighton the other day I picked up similar complaints about the way Travellers ? like lots of other people ? like to head to the south coast in the summer. Brighton's new Green council has been struggling to get the right mixture of firmness and fairness. It's harder in power than in opposition.

Why don't we hear more from Dale Farm's local residents, the ones who live in the neighbourhood for all 12 months of the year? When I tweeted a sceptical note some tweeters rapidly told me most feel too intimidated (how do they know?), while others abused them/me. It's worth raising the point. Despite ? or because of? ? our noisy well-wired world all sorts of people feel unheard.

There's another read-across here which some have seized upon, others studiously ignored, to illustrate the darker side of such disputes; namely the recent flurry of police arrests for alleged "slavery" by Traveller groups of homeless people in need of shelter and a few bob to eat (or drink). Again, the facts are disputed. Some "slaves" freed by the police have refused to co-operate and gone straight back to their "jailers." Others and their families have told sad stories.

It's tricky, that much we can all see. But the anarchists/anti-fascist/human rights campaigners who have endorsed the Dale Farm camp ? some of them turning up to make trouble, so they have been saying ? seem reluctant to concede that some local worries are likely to be legitimate.

As for the Travellers themselves, some of those interviewed seem to want their cake and eat it: to have proper homes with electricity and water, but also to travel at certain times of year, to educate their kids but also to take them out of school, to be part of the community but also keep to themselves and their traditional habits and extended family life.

Would the BBC's star reporter want the Dale Camp hold-outs turning up in the park at the end of his street? I doubt it. Nor would I. But it's always a test worth bearing in mind.


guardian.co.uk © 2011 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/blog/2011/sep/19/dale-farm-two-sides-story

Sean Hannity Harry Reid Mitch McConnel Rush Limbaugh George Bush

Why is Vince Cable fighting Liberal Democrat green policies? | Damian Carrington

His conference speech faced both ways on green growth, while previously he tried to blackball eminent figures from the Green Investment Bank's advisory board

Update: What's up with Vince Cable? That's the question greens are asking as the business secretary again displayed his inner conflict on green growth in his speech to the Liberal Democrat party conference here in Birmingham on Monday.

Earlier today, I revealed that Vince Cable tried to blackball one of the world's most eminent economists and also the Prime Minister's ambassador for UK business from the advisory board of the Green Investment Bank (see below). It was the latest in a string of obstructions that Cable, ably assisted by the trolls of the Treasury, had placed on the road to green growth.

In his speech, which was warmly but not rapturously received by his party faithful, he by turns embraced green growth but then blanked it in order to enhance his deficit-cutting credentials.

The question is this: can green growth, investment in clean energy and transport, boost sustainable economic growth and provide much-needed jobs? There's a very persuasive case that the answer is yes, especially if it puts the UK's record private savings to productive work.

But there's a deeply entrenched view, the orthodoxy in the Treasury, that green growth is not real growth, and should only be entertained if happier economic times. Cable seems caught awkwardly between the two.

So, on the one hand he praises in his speech the Green Investment Bank, the Green Deal to insulate homes, and the jobs provided by electric car plants. Then on the other, he says, defending the cuts many say are too deep: "The government's tough approach to deficit reduction is often attacked as ideological, as right wing. Financial discipline is not ideological; it is a necessary precondition for effective government. The progressive agenda of centre left parties cannot be delivered by bankrupt governments."

I think of this as the "grown up" argument: when it really gets tough serious politicians have to sideline all that fluffy greenery. It's common prejudice, but a ludicrous one in a finite, warming world.

Gratifyingly, Cable all but confirms his desire to be considered a grown-up: "Some [politicians] believe government is Father Christmas. They draw up lists of tax cuts and giveaways and assume that Santa will pop down the chimney and leave presents under the tree. This is childish fantasy."

Cable is also in a spin about regulation. Supporting business "means cutting red tape which is suffocating growing companies which create jobs," Cable was going to say, though the phrase was intriguingly dropped minutes before he spoke. Yet the final draft of his speech also said the opposite: "There are tens of billions of pounds of British savings in pension funds and insurance companies ready to invest in transport, energy, broadband and housing if regulators can ensure a reasonable, moderate return."

Why is Cable confused? Treasury and Business department officials are key, I think, in convincing him that green and growth can't really go together. Commenter Avenir below suggests Cable's former job as chief economist at oil company Royal Dutch Shell is significant. Whatever the reason, he is missing the economic chance to drive real, sustainable growth and the political chance to regain some of the LibDems distinctiveness on green policy. The refocus on green growth he has hinted at this autumn had better be good.

Original post: Vince Cable, despite the LibDem's environmental heritage, just can't stop trying to put the brakes on green growth. Surrounded by the "grown-ups" in the department of business, backed up by the trolls of the Treasury, he's been convinced that green and growth just can't go together.

The latest evidence, I can reveal thanks to sources inside and outside Whitehall, is that he fought fiercely to keep economist Lord Nick Stern and business big shot Bob Wigley off the advisory board of the Green Investment Bank. As we know, Cable tried hard to limit the GIB's powers and caved in to the special pleading of big polluters over the UK's national carbon budgets.

Why would he attempt to blackball Stern, one of the world's most eminent economists, and Wigley, the Prime Minister's ambassador for UK business? Most probably, I think, because the pair are heavyweights who believe the bank has a big role to play in the UK's transition to the low carbon economy, whereas Cable and Treasury want to limit its role. The former think intervention is necessary to correct market failures, the latter think intervention is a cardinal economic sin.

In the end, ministers at the department of energy and climate change, led by LibDem Chris Huhne, defeated Cable and Stern and Wigley got their seats.

The GIB has �3bn to invest, which is a lot, but unfortunately too little compared to the tens or hundreds of billions needed. A real bank could raise the money by borrowing. But the GIB Cable delivered is hamstrung and won't be able to borrow for years, despite the LibDem manifesto clearly stating it should be able to borrow from the start.

But is there a glimmer of hope, a hint that Cable and chancellor George Osborne are starting to see the green light? A recent story in the FT, headlined Osborne and Cable prepare for green moves offers cause for cautious optimism.

George Osborne and Vince Cable are drawing up environmental initiatives for the autumn growth review in an attempt to revive the coalition's "green" credentials.

The government has identified six areas it will address in the review ? the second this year ? in an attempt to stimulate the flatlining economy. "They are trying to pull out the stops to make this review much greener than the spring growth review," an industry insider said.

David Cameron's reputation as an environmentalist has waned since he entered 10 Downing Street, with economic growth taking precedence over green issues. But one government insider said: "There is a new recognition that the green agenda is a pro-growth agenda and . . . means jobs and investment."

Green and growth go together like strawberries and cream, as I have reported before. So we'll be waiting and watching for the those initiatives - on guard for greenwash.


guardian.co.uk © 2011 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/damian-carrington-blog/2011/sep/19/green-investment-bank-economy-vince-cable

Hillary Clinton Tom DeLay Elizabeth Dole John Edwards Dianne Feinstein

We need to know the truth about vCJD numbers | Frank Dobson

It's estimated that one in 4,000 people are unknowingly infected. The government must authorise trials of a new blood test

The government's expert advisers assume that as many as 15,000 people in this country are infected with the prion infection agents that cause the lethal brain disease, variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob (vCJD), the human form of BSE or "mad cow disease". The experts don't know if this is the right figure. It could be a lot higher but ministers are refusing to fund trials of a new test to find out.

So far just 200 of our fellow citizens have developed the disease. But the prions that cause the disease can lie dormant for decades and people who are infected pose a risk to others if they are blood or organ donors, or if surgical instruments used on them are then reused on other patients.

The Medical Research Council Prion Unit at the UCL Institute of Neurology, led by Professor John Collinge, was set up at my behest to come up with ways to treat vCJD and, better still, prevent it. They were also asked to devise a test to identify vCJD in the general population. They recently announced a new blood test that does just that. This is a great breakthrough. It should enable our doctors and scientists, for the first time, to assess accurately the incidence of vCJD infection so policy decisions on how best to protect patients can be based on evidence, not guesswork.

As health secretary, the day I became aware in 1998 that it might be possible to transmit vCJD by blood and blood products, I got the experts together. Their advice was that infection through blood and blood products was likely but not certain and that the infection, if any, would probably be carried in the white blood cells. "What should we do?" I asked. The answer for the blood supply was leucodepletion (removing the white cells) at a cost of �100m. When I told Tony Blair that I'd authorised spending this �100m but hoped it would prove to be a waste of money, his response was "fuck me". The blood for a transfusion usually comes from just a few donors but blood products come from many more donors, so the chances of infection were much greater. I had to agree that we should end UK sourcing of blood products ? easier said than done.

At the time these decisions had to be taken, there was no way of assessing how many people might be infected. Officials produced "computer projections", ranging from fewer than 200 vCJD fatalities to 3.5 million. These were no more than guesses. I authorised testing of tissue samples from tonsils and appendixes which eventually produced some data which was a little bit more reliable but not much. And so it has continued to this day. In their current risk assessment, the Department of Health assume that 15,000 people (one person in every 4,000) are infected but don't know.

So largely on the basis of the precautionary principle, no less than �540m has been invested since 1998 to try to protect the integrity of blood supplies and blood products. The current annual cost is over �40m plus �200m a year to supply synthetic clotting factor for the treatment of bleeding disorders.

With so many lives possibly at stake and so much money being spent, the new blood test offers the prospect of certainty for the first time. The researchers want the government to authorise trials of the new blood test so we will know how many people are likely to be infected with vCJD. Things may turn out to be better than expected or may be worse. But at least we will know and will be able to tailor the precautionary measures to the scale of the problem. That in turn may raise ethical problems about advising patients believed to be infected with vCJD until there is a treatment. Fortunately the work carried out by the Prion Unit has made such progress that doctors may soon be able to inhibit the development of vCJD, ultimately to cure it and, better still, prevent it ? along with other degenerative diseases of the brain, possibly including Alzheimer's. Sadly, so far, the government have refused to authorise and fund the trials. They prefer to continue to remain in ignorance.

The health secretary Andrew Lansley has a lot on his plate at the moment, but he shouldn't let political problems divert him from his basic duty to promote the long-term interests of the nation's health. He should authorise and fund the trials of the new blood test and do it now.


guardian.co.uk © 2011 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/sep/19/vcjd-blood-test-trials

George W. Bush Hillary Clinton Bill Clinton Rudy Giuliani Jimmy Carter

Clinton: GOP opposition to soften in election year (AP)

WASHINGTON ? Former President Bill Clinton on Monday dismissed Republican criticism of a debt-reduction proposal to raise taxes on the wealthy, and predicted President Barack Obama will see greater cooperation in the upcoming election year.

Republican leaders already are lining up against Obama's proposal to end Bush-era tax cuts and to increase taxes on the nation's wealthiest people. But Clinton told NBC's "Today" show the GOP rhetoric is nothing new and not a deal-breaker for Obama.

"The Republicans in Washington always say the same thing," arguing that any tax on any upper-income person is bad because it stifles job creation, Clinton told NBC's "Today" show.

"It's an insult to those people," he said. "They don't mind being asked to pay their fair share."

The GOP opposition should diminish as the 2012 election approaches, just as it did in 1996, Clinton said. His clashes with Republicans in 1995 led to two government shutdowns, but in the 1996 election year he began experiencing greater cooperation, including passage of an increase in the minimum wage.

"We got things done in the election year," Clinton said.

Clinton also cautioned that increased bickering among ideologues is hurting the nation's reputation internationally because the arguments often aren't based on facts. He said "Democrats are not blameless," but he singled out conservatives who take "the anti-government extreme position" never to increase taxes.

"It scares people around the world," he said.

Clinton said the nation could be struggling for the next five years or more to emerge from its economic slump. But focusing on mortgage debt problems could help the recovery.

"I think the quickest thing we could do to move out of this would be to clear this mortgage debt more quickly," he said.

He called for providing relief to homeowners with mortgage debt greater than the house's worth, either by reducing the amount of debt, adding years to the payoff to reduce monthly payments or converting the loan to rent payments so people can remain in their homes.



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement | WordPress Tutorials

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/politics/*http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110919/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_clinton_economy

Wu Yi Viktor Yushchenko Nancy Pelosi Speaker Pelosi Tea Party

There is no age limit in the fight for health

This week the United Nations is bringing together world leaders to discuss the global health crisis of non-communicable diseases (NCDs): strokes, cancer, heart attacks, lung disease and dementia (Report, 17 September). These diseases are on the rise like never before: by 2030, the World Health Organisation (WHO) predicts that the top four killers in the world will be NCDs. What is most striking is that their impact is felt most on those over the age of 60, yet the emphasis of the summit is clearly on younger people. According to the WHO's own statistics, 75% of deaths from NCDs globally occur in people aged 60 and over ? an estimated 27 million people. Population ageing, as well as lifestyle factors, is inextricably linked to this global challenge.

The rise of NCDs is not a problem isolated to wealthier countries. According to some estimates, the over-60 population in developing countries is increasing 3% per year (compared to 2% in developed countries) and will grow from 473 million people in 2009 to 1.6 billion in 2050.

An ageing population brings a new set of critical health challenges. Alzheimer's disease and other dementias, for example, affect 12% of those over 65 and more than 30% of those over 85. Over the next two decades, the number of people aged 65 and older suffering from diabetes is expected to increase by 134%. And then there's cancer, which, according to one British study, is six times more likely to affect women aged 60 to 64 than women aged 35 to 38.

To win the fight against NCDs, governments and stakeholders must come together to create solutions that are appropriate for people of all ages, with no age limits being set for good health.
Richard Blewitt HelpAge International, Michelle Mitchell Age UK, Marc Wortman Alzheimer's Disease International, Michael Hodin Global Coalition on Aging


guardian.co.uk © 2011 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/sep/18/no-age-limit-fight-health

Saparmurat Niyazov Ehud Olmert Ron Paul Colin Powell Vladimir Putin