Wednesday, June 29, 2011

An Exceptional Fourth of July

Victor Davis Hanson, IBD
For the last 235 years, on the Fourth of July, Americans have celebrated the birth of the United States, and the founding ideas that have made it the most powerful, wealthiest and freest nation in the history of civilization.But as another Fourth of July approaches, there has never been more uncertainty about the future of America -- and the anxiety transcends even the dismal economy and three foreign wars. President Obama prompted such introspection in April 2009, when he suggested that the United States, as one of many nations, was not necessarily any more exceptional than others. Recently,...

Source: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2011/06/29/an_exceptional_fourth_of_july_258434.html

Dick Cheney Noam Chomsky Bill Clinton Hillary Clinton Tom DeLay

Low-Slung Clouds Over Delaware Bay

...pregnant with rain and, perhaps, significance

Source: http://www.vanityfair.com/online/wolcott/2011/06/low-slung-clouds-over-delaware-bay.html

Camilla Mountbatten-Windsor Duchess of Cornwall Robert Mugabe Ralph Nader Saparmurat Niyazov

EU calls for 'Tobin' tax in a move to raise direct revenue

European commission unveils trillion-euro budget plan and wants bigger share of its spending to come from tax revenue or other levies that go automatically to Brussels

The European commission has called for Tobin-style taxes on the EU's financial sector to generate direct revenue for its first trillion-euro budget.

Unveiling its blueprint for the EU budget for the seven years from 2014, the commission demanded a bigger share of its spending supplied from "own resources" ? tax revenue or other levies that go auto- matically to Brussels rather than being handed over by the 27 member states.

In the face of stiff opposition from Britain, the commission called for much of the budget to come directly from new financial market taxes and a simplified method of taking a share of member states' VAT receipts. "We are proposing an ambitious and, at the same time, responsible budget," said Jos� Manuel Barroso, the president of the commission. "It is a realistic proposal."

The proposed budget for 2014-2020 amounts to ?971.5bn (�872bn) in payments and ?1,025tn in commitments. "It's a ?1tn budget," said an EU official. It is the opening round in what will be a gruelling 18 months of battle between national governments, the commission and the European parliament.

David Cameron, the British prime minister, has selected the budget issue as the key battleground for his EU policy, heading a group of wealthier countries determined to minimise budget increases. They want to subject EU institutions and its spending to the same sort of austerity measures being implemented in many member states.

Together with German, French, Dutch and Finnish leaders, Cameron has demanded that the 2014-2020 budget spending be frozen at the level of 2013, rising only in line with inflation. That would mean the EU budget would amount to about 0.92% of aggregated EU gross national income. The final proposal being haggled over on Wednesday was believed to come in at 1.02%.

The mountain of documentation that is being released by the commission was preceded by lengthy negotiations within the executive. The EU's foreign policy chief, Lady Ashton, who also sits as Britain's commissioner, was said to have used an 11-hour session this week to win early agreement on the sanctity of Britain's perennially contested rebate, currently worth �3bn a year. "There will always be corrections if there are imbalances," she maintained. The commission said that it wanted to simplify the rebate system through a new practice of annual lump-sum reductions.

Ashton also argued that an EU tax on financial transactions, which is strongly opposed by the British government, would not work unless also levied internationally. Precise details of the proposed taxes on the financial sector remained unclear.

The British government promptly dismissed the commission blueprint. "The European commission's proposal is completely unrealistic," a spokesperson said. "It is too large, not the restrained budget they claim and incompatible with the tough decisions being taken in countries across Europe."

Britain is to resist any idea that the commission could levy direct European taxes to raise revenue. The commission denies that it is demanding direct European taxes.

The government also fears that a financial transactions tax ? a Tobin or "Robin Hood" tax ? would disproportionately penalise the City of London, with traders and banks probably just moving to New York or the far east. "We would lose jobs and revenue," said an official.

Support for such a move, however, is growing among both EU governments. A recent Eurobarometer opinion poll showed 61% support for a tax on financial transactions across the EU, with two- thirds of Britons backing it.

David Hillman, spokesman for the Robin Hood Tax campaign, said: "The British government should wake up and smell the coffee. Other governments are moving ahead with a bank tax, while we are letting our financial sector off the hook.

"A Robin Hood tax on the banks would be the most popular tax in history."


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jun/29/ec-proposes-tobin-style-taxes

Wu Yi Viktor Yushchenko Nancy Pelosi Speaker Pelosi Tea Party

Obama call for stimulus may complicate debt talks

WASHINGTON | Wed Jun 29, 2011 6:18pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. President Barack Obama called on Wednesday for new steps to spur job growth and tax hikes on the rich, hardening a stance that will likely complicate deficit reduction talks with Republicans.

Obama's call came as the International Monetary Fund and the Treasury Department urged Washington to reach a budget deal that would pave the way for Congress to raise the United States' $14.3 trillion borrowing limit by August 2.

Failure to increase the debt ceiling, which caps how much the United States can borrow, would likely trigger a default that could plunge the United States into a new recession and roil global financial markets, the Obama administration and economists warn.

Obama's push for new construction loans and an extension of a payroll tax cut could further alienate Republicans already incensed by Democratic demands for new tax revenue.

Challenging lawmakers to make "substantial progress" by the end of this week or cancel plans for the July 4th holiday weekend, Obama upped pressure on Republicans by tying them to tax breaks for "millionaires and billionaires" while warning of default.

"If the United States government, for the first time, cannot pay its bills, if it defaults, then the consequences for the U.S. economy will be significant and unpredictable," he told a White House news conference, reminding Republican Party backers on Wall Street of the stakes involved.

Standard and Poor's rating agency told Reuters it would immediately cut the United States' top-notch credit rating if it missed a $30 billion debt payment on August 4.

With the country still struggling to emerge from the deepest recession since the 1930s, Obama said Congress needs to take steps to bring down the 9.1 percent unemployment rate even as it weighs medium-term austerity measures.

"There are more steps that we can take right now that would help businesses create jobs here in America," he said.

Those measures likely would add hundreds of billions of dollars to budget deficits at a time when the White House and lawmakers are trying to narrow them by more than $1 trillion.

Congressional Republicans, determined to cut spending, say additional stimulus have no place in the debt ceiling talks.

"The president's remarks today ignore legislative and economic reality," said Republican House of Representatives leader John Boehner. "The president is sorely mistaken if he believes a bill to raise the debt ceiling and raise taxes would pass the House. The votes simply aren't there."

The budget deficit for the fiscal year that ends September 30 is expected to hit $1.4 trillion, one of the highest as a share of the economy since World War Two.

Since deficit-reduction talks collapsed last week, Republicans and Democrats have made no progress on a deal to allow Congress to extend the government's borrowing authority.

But Obama, invoking the example of his daughters Sasha and Malia, told Congress to do its job: "They don't wait until the night before. They're not pulling all-nighters. They're -- they're 13 and 10. You know, Congress can do the same thing."

Analysts said Obama had not broken new ground, but forcefully framed Democrats as backing ordinary Americans while Republicans look out for the wealthy.

This is "the strongest argument that Democrats have made in a while in the whole budget area. They're talking about trade-offs, a balanced package," said Andy Laperriere, an analyst with the ISI Group in Washington.

But, Obama "was asked to draw a line in the sand over requiring higher taxes to get a deal, and he declined," Laperriere said.

Obama, echoing an argument his administration has made for weeks, sought to paint Republicans as siding with the rich and powerful over middle class Americans.

"If we choose to keep those tax breaks for millionaires and billionaires, if we choose to keep a tax break for corporate jet owners ... then that means we've got to cut some kids off from getting a college scholarship," he said.

Time is running out for the White House and Republicans to reach a deficit reduction deal.

The International Monetary Fund said on Wednesday that failure to reach a deal soon could deliver a "severe shock" to a still-fragile recovery and global markets.

Financial markets have so far shown little concern, but credit-rating agencies have warned they could reassess their outlook on U.S. debt if a deal is not in the works by mid-July.

"If the U.S. government misses a payment, it goes to D," said Standard and Poor's managing director John Chambers, speaking of the country's debt rating.

Geithner said investors would shun U.S. debt after the August deadline even if Treasury made debt payments its top priority -- an approach backed by some conservative Republicans.

"There is no credible budget plan under which a debt limit increase can be avoided," he warned.

Obama met top Senate Democrats later on Wednesday to discuss the deficit negotiations.

(Writing by Andy Sullivan and Alister Bull, additional reporting by David Morgan, Glenn Somerville, David Lawder, Patricia Zengerle, Richard Cowan and Emily Stephenson in Washington and Ellen Freilich in New York; Editing by Cynthia Osterman)



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement | WordPress Tutorials

Source: http://feeds.reuters.com/~r/Reuters/PoliticsNews/~3/Q4itcWuMe2Y/us-usa-debt-idUSTRE75M80E20110629

Elizabeth Windsor Queen Elizabeth II Wu Yi Viktor Yushchenko Nancy Pelosi

Should Obama Stop Defending the Recovery?

Michael Scherer, Time
Stanley Greenberg, the Democratic pollster who helped elect President Bill Clinton, South Africa's Nelson Mandela and Israel's Ehud Barak, says all of his clients have had the same, sometimes terrible, instinct: “They want to prove that their economic policies have worked.”In times of plenty, that gut feeling is right. The nation cheered the gangbusters growth under Ronald Reagan in 1984, and the mid-1990s Clinton economic boom. But when the economy is sour, politicians who litigate the past risk sounding tone-deaf to the troubles of the present. This is why...

Source: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2011/06/29/should_obama_stop_defending_the_recovery_258378.html

John McCain Evo Morales William Mountbatten-Windsor Prince William Charles Mountbatten-Windsor

Rhode Island poised to vote on same-sex marriage

(CNN) -- Less than a week after New York became the nation's sixth state to legalize same-sex marriage, Rhode Island lawmakers are poised to vote on a bill that would permit civil unions between gay and lesbian couples.

The bill is widely seen as compromise meant to provide same-same couples with legal rights and benefits afforded to married couples, while also preventing an expanded definition of marriage.

Rhode Island's Senate Judiciary Committee approved the measure late Wednesday afternoon by a vote of 7-4, sending it to the Democrat-controlled Senate floor where lawmakers are expected to approve the bill, according to the state Senate's spokesman, Greg Pare.

The legislation, which passed overwhelmingly in the state's lower house on May 19, would afford same-sex couples a host of state tax breaks, healthcare benefits and foster a greater ease of inheritance.

Gov. Lincoln Chaffe, an independent, is expected to sign the bill into law should it pass the Democrat-controlled Senate, according to his spokesman, Michael Trainor.

But the controversial measure also drew sharp criticism from religious leaders and other opposition groups who say it would lead to court-ordered action that would eventually legalize same-sex marriage.

Similar legal action in Connecticut and Massachusetts resulted in those states adopting same-sex marriage laws, noted Christopher Plante, executive director of the National Organization for Marriage's Rhode Island chapter.

Chaffe -- who is supportive of potential legislation that legalizes same-sex marriage -- says civil unions are "a step in the right direction," according to Trainor.

Meanwhile, gay rights activists -- like Marriage Equality Rhode Island -- say that while they support the civil union bill, they would prefer legislation that permits same-sex couples to wed.

The group has also urged Chaffe not to sign the measure if it includes a controversial House amendment that permits groups with religious affiliations to refuse certain legal rights afforded to civil unions.

For instance, a hospital with a religious affiliation could refuse a civil union partner from being involved in the emergency medical care decisions of their spouse if it chose to do so, said Ray Sullivan, a spokesman for the activist group.

Chaffe is "very aware of the concerns that have been expressed," Trainor said, but will likely sign the bill into law should it pass the Senate.

House spokesman Larry Berman called the amendment a "red herring," pursued by the state's more radical activists.

The exemption, he said, is meant to provide religious protections against potential litigation.

"It's a small exception," Berman said, when compared to the slew of new rights and benefits same-sex couples would enjoy should the measure pass.

Civil unions are currently permitted in New Jersey and Illinois, and will be allowed in Delaware and Hawaii beginning January 1, 2012.

Three West Coast states -- California, Oregon and Washington -- plus Nevada, also allow for "comprehensive domestic partnerships" between same-sex couples, largely considered an equivalent to their civil union counterparts.

Rhode Island and Maine are the only states in New England that do not permit same-sex marriage. Iowa, New York and the District of Columbia also allow gay and lesbian couples to wed.

Last week, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo a signed a bill that legalizes same-sex marriage, more than doubling the number of Americans living in states that permit such unions.

The measure will take effect on July 24, providing gay and lesbian couples with new rights that include employer health benefits, easier inheritance and a host of state tax breaks.

Federal recognition, however, was not a part of Friday's vote, leaving benefits like Social Security and ease of immigration largely out of reach for same-sex couples.

The controversial bill passed New York's Republican-controlled Senate before reaching Cuomo's desk, in an extended legislative session that left many skeptical over whether lawmakers would bring the measure to a vote.



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement | WordPress Tutorials

Source: http://rss.cnn.com/~r/rss/cnn_allpolitics/~3/baR3cps70G4/index.html

Dennis Hastert Vaclav Havel John Howard Mike Huckabee Saddam Hussein

Why we're debating 1788 and all that

Should Australia's pride in its economic resilience, extraordinary stage of development, cosmopolitan culture and all-round good luck be clouded with an enduring guilt? How much of this very real pain should we feel, as the descendants of the architects of this colonial adventure here in England, along with those who reaped its benefits in Australia? In other words, can we reconcile the bounty of this prize with the plight of the people who had it first?

More than mere political correctness, the issue ? complex, emotive and hugely sensitive ? is one of moral culpability. White Australians continue to say "sorry" and, as we have seen this week, make compromises. As long as these compromises
and apologies don't cost them too much, they appear to be heartfelt and legitimate. But for Aboriginal Australians, it really is the case that "sorry" isn't good enough.

It would be impossible, given their history, for Australians not to have an uneasy relationship with race, with national identity and with immigration. Australia's murky past is not that distant: until the 1970s a "White Australia" policy was enforced to restrict the inflow of non-white immigrants. Australia's non-indigenous population represents more than 95 per cent of the total, and a quarter of its residents are foreign-born, but still this is not an easy country to emigrate to. Even British people for whose trade or skill Australia has little demand are excluded.

Australia has an island mentality, and to the boat people from such war-torn countries as Sri Lanka and Afghanistan, hoping to start new lives in Australia, it shouts, with less and less ambiguity, "Warra, Warra!" The vast majority of these afflicted peoples do not even make it to the mainland, being detained on Christmas Island, in the Indian Ocean, for "processing", a word with uncomfortably Orwellian connotations.

Politicians exploit this insularity for their own ends: in the last election, and indeed the last several elections, immigration ? especially the issue of boat people ? has dominated political discourse. Rather like health care in America, it has split small-L liberal and conservative Australia beyond its traditional party affiliations. Zealous anti-immigration political figures have emerged, such as Pauline Hanson, leader of the One Nation Party who, in her first speech before parliament in 1996, said: "I believe we are in danger of being swamped by Asianse_SLps a truly multi-cultural country can never be strong
or united."

Hanson was a precursor to such populist Right-wing figures as France's Marine Le Pen, but it is a great compliment to Australia that her initial support and profile waned, and she is now a largely forgotten figure. Or at least, it shows that if some Australians are a little bit racist, then they certainly don't like to be seen as racist.

So, is Australia racist? My own experience, having attended school there until the age of 11, and then lived there during my early twenties, is that underneath the blokey "mateship" of a certain type of Australian male there is a seam of racism. This racism is not only applied to indigenous Australians, but also to, for instance, the Lebanese and Greek immigrants who
live there.

The term "wog" is in common use in Australia in a way that would be unacceptable anywhere else ? indeed, it has been appropriated, in an act of (some would say misguided) self-empowerment, by the "Mediterranean" communities themselves. There remains a subtle division between white Australians and even their "ethnic" (another unsavoury Australian epithet) friends. They are assimilated, but divided also. It's a very subtle, local dynamic, a hangover from being a country that felt almost entirely "white" from 1788 until the 1950s.

I did a story once for an Australian newspaper on "Bachelor and Spinster" (B&S) balls. These are parties held inland for young people often living hundreds of miles from one another. They come together to drink and get off, and to forget the hardship of an Australian agricultural industry brought virtually to its knees by near-constant drought.

The white kids at the party I attended got drunk and groped each other; meanwhile I saw, 300 metres away, a group of Aboriginal teenagers drinking nervously by the river. We wanted to meet them, and began walking their way, only to be told, "Don't go down there ? there's darkies by the river." This is a very specific sort of racism, born not perhaps of malice but of ignorance and, I think, as natural to a specific sort of Australian as sunburn and blowflies. Dame Edna summed it up when she said: "I'm not racist; I like all races, especially white people."

Hanson's belief that a truly multi-cultural and cosmopolitan country is not a strong one is misguided. Australia, despite the residual tensions and occasional conflicts, is multi-cultural, and it is stronger for this reason. For if "White Australia" still exists in the hearts of a small but not minuscule minority, there is a new Australian identity made up of varied ethnic groups. They are Greek, Lebanese, Irish, English, Indian, Chinese, Vietnamese and Australian. And Australia is them.

Oscar Humphries is the editor of the art magazine 'Apollo'. He was the launch editor of 'The Spectator Australia'



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement | WordPress Tutorials

Source: http://telegraph.feedsportal.com/c/32726/f/568387/s/16498dda/l/0L0Stelegraph0O0Cnews0Cworldnews0Caustraliaandthepacific0C860A71570CWhy0Ewere0Edebating0E17880Eand0Eall0Ethat0Bhtml/story01.htm

Laura Bush George W. Bush George H. W. Bush Jimmy Carter Fidel Castro